السبت، 31 أغسطس 2024

Download PDF | (Handbook of Oriental Studies) Adam Gacek - The Arabic Manuscript Tradition_ A Glossary of Technical Terms and Bibliography-Brill Academic Publishers (2001).

Download PDF | (Handbook of Oriental Studies) Adam Gacek - The Arabic Manuscript Tradition_ A Glossary of Technical Terms and Bibliography-Brill Academic Publishers (2001).

289 Pages






ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I am very grateful to Prof. David Pingree for recommending this work for publication and my colleague Prof. François Déroche for his comments and suggestions. My gratitude also goes to Steve Millier and Khaleel Mohammed for having kindly proof-read this text. Last but not least, I am thankful to McGill University for granting me a sabbatic leave, without which this work would most probably not have seen the light of day. 









Link 











Press Here 










Download PDF | (Handbook of Oriental Studies_ Section 1_ The Near and Middle East) Amar S. Baadj (editor) - A Handbook of Modern Arabic Historical Scholarship on the Ancient and Medieval Periods-BRILL (2021).

Download PDF | (Handbook of Oriental Studies_ Section 1_ The Near and Middle East) Amar S. Baadj (editor) - A Handbook of Modern Arabic Historical Scholarship on the Ancient and Medieval Periods-BRILL (2021).

684 Pages 



English Preface 

 Why Modern Arabic Historiography? 

The present volume brings together sixteen studies concerning modern Arabic academic scholarship on the ancient and medieval worlds. Most of the chapters are concerned with specific disciplines or sub-disciplines (such as Egyptology, Byzantine Studies, Mamluk Studies, etc.) while others focus on what can be characterized as “schools” or movements of historiography. Some of the studies focus on a single country in the Arab world while others look at developments across several countries.







 The arrangement of the chapters is broadly chronological, beginning with those disciplines that study the earliest civilizations in North Africa and the Middle East, and concluding with the disciplines and historiographical schools that are concerned with the study of what, for lack of a better commonly accepted term, we may refer to as the “late medieval” history of the region, prior to the period of Ottoman domination. Though the great bulk of the scholarly work under consideration in this volume is – as one would expect – in Arabic, some of the chapters also discuss works written by Arab historians in European languages such as English and French. Many, though not all, of the chapters developed out of papers presented at an international conference held in Trier, Germany between October 21 and October 23, 2017, entitled “Modern Arabic Historical Scholarship on the Ancient and Medieval Periods”. 













This conference, sponsored by Trier University and the Thyssen Foundation, was the first of its kind. It brought together specialists in various fields from the Arab world, Europe, and North America who discussed the development and current state of the pre-modern historical disciplines in the Arab countries, and the problem of the lack of visibility of this scholarship in Western academic circles. The editor is painfully aware that some very important topics are missing from this volume such as chapters on the fields of Abbasid, Fatimid, and Crusade studies in the Arab world as well as studies on the rise and development of modern historical scholarship in Bilād al-Shām, the Arabian Peninsula, Sudan, and Libya. These unfortunate gaps are due, in large part, to circumstances that were beyond the editor’s control, such as unexpected and late withdrawals of contributions for various reasons. It is hoped that these omissions can be redressed in a second volume. At a later stage perhaps modern Arabic historiography of the Ottoman, Colonial, and Post-Independence periods can receive similar treatment. It should be pointed out that there is also a need for reference works of this nature on modern academic Persian and Turkish historical scholarship. This volume has a number of aims. 









It was conceived within the wider framework of a collaborative research project on “The Contemporary History of Historiography,” led by Professor Lutz Raphael at Trier University and funded by the German Research Foundation (dfg), which seeks to view the contemporary history of this discipline from a truly international perspective, taking into account developments not only in Europe and North America but also in the less studied non-Western regions. Therefore, one of the goals of this volume is to contribute to increasing our knowledge about the rise, development, and present state of the modern academic field of historical studies in the Arab countries. To date only a small handful of studies have been written on this subject in English and other European languages. Even these works are overwhelmingly concerned with Arabic scholarship on the Early Modern (Ottoman) and Modern periods. The histories of entire fields (such as Assyriology, Byzantine Studies, Mamluk Studies, etc.) and important historiographical schools and trends in the Arab world have yet to be written in Western languages and sometimes even in Arabic itself. As a result, most of the studies presented in this volume are the very first of their kind and will no doubt be of value for those who seek a global perspective on modern historiography and its various sub-disciplines. 










The second goal of this book is to meet the needs of specialists in the various disciplines of ancient and medieval studies who are based outside of the Arab countries and who wish to be better acquainted with the state of their field in the Arab world and with the work done by their Arab colleagues. This is obviously a pressing need in the case of fields whose geographical areas of focus wholly (as in the case of Egyptology) or partially (as in the case of Greco-Roman studies) overlap with a portion of the Arab world and which at the same time do not employ Arabic as a language of research at an international level. For example, the vast majority of Assyriologists outside of the Arab countries do not read Arabic, therefore, they have limited knowledge of and access to a fairly large body of Assyriological scholarship (including publications of cuneiform tablets) that has been produced by Iraqi scholars over the last 70 years. Information about the history and current state of the Assyriological discipline in Iraq, and the Arabic publications in this field, is thus of great practical value to the international community of Assyriology and can facilitate cooperation between Iraqi scholars and their colleagues abroad. Surprisingly, the same problem also exists in the field of Arabic and Islamic studies. It is still the case that many monographs and dissertations on Islamic history written in the West make no reference at all to secondary literature in written in Arabic and other “oriental” languages such as Persian or Turkish. 









With a few exceptions, Arabic studies are seldom reviewed in Western journals and they are often missing from bibliographies. The standard bibliographical resource for the field of Islamic Studies, the renowned Index Islamicus, is, according to its website, limited to “… material published by Western scholars in the fields of Humanities and Social Sciences, specialist area- and subjectbased areas, and by Muslims writing in European languages.”1 In order to remedy this gap, the editor and many of the contributors to the present volume hope to eventually create an open-access database of discipline-specific bibliographies of Arabic secondary works on pre-modern history for the benefit of international researchers.








 In the European languages there is also a serious lack of basic summaries or introductions to modern Arabic scholarship on the various sub-fields of Islamic history that identify important scholars, historical “schools”, publications, and intellectual trends. There has been little interest in the history and development of professional historical studies in the modern Arab world in comparison to the rich body of literature on the history of the various European schools of oriental studies.2 Due to the lack of such studies as well as of bibliographical aids and reviews it is difficult for specialists in medieval Islamic history who are based in the West to gain an accurate picture of the state of their field in the Arab world and identify Arabic works which might be helpful in their research. Non-Arab scholars specializing in the history of the Islamic period should be familiar with contemporary Arabic historical scholarship, not only in order to better “know their field” by mastering a comprehensive bibliography of the discipline which is not limited to Western studies, but also because their own work will be enriched and enhanced by utilizing and engaging with Arabic scholarship. To illustrate the importance of contemporary Arabic historical scholarship we can look briefly at the field of medieval Maghribī history, the branch of Islamic history with which the editor of this volume is most familiar. Until the 1970s this field was clearly dominated at an international level by French scholarship, though it is important to note that, by the 1950s, an Arab school of Andalusī and Maghribī studies already existed in Egypt, which included some pioneering historians such as Ḥusayn Muʾnis, Muḥammad ʿAbdallāh ʿInān, and Ḥasan Aḥmad Maḥmūd. 











From the 1980s onward many new universities (with new History departments) were established in the countries of the Maghrib and as a result the number of Moroccan, Algerian, and Tunisian medievalists has increased dramatically along with an accompanying surge in the volume of publications (journals, theses, monographs, and editions of texts). At the same time every respectable history department in the eastern Arab world has at least one professor of medieval Maghribī and Andalusī history. Due to these factors, today the overwhelming majority of academic studies on the medieval Maghrib (and a very considerable portion of the studies on al-Andalus as well) are in Arabic and they cover a great variety of topics, many of which have been only lightly treated in Western scholarship. A notable feature of Arabic scholarship on the medieval Maghrib and alAndalus since at least the 1980s is the great attention that has been given to economic and social history. A considerable number of pioneering, sophisticated studies have been produced in this area, and they deserve greater recognition from specialists outside of the Arab world. A few randomly selected examples of outstanding and thought-provoking works of this nature (some with very different methodological approaches) include the magisterial studies of Muḥammad Ḥasan and Ṣāliḥ Baʿayzīq on the society and economy of Ḥafsid Ifrīqīya and Bijāya respectively, ʿUmar Binmīra’s study on society in the Moroccan countryside under the Merinids, the works of Brahim Kadiri Boutchich (Ibrāhīm al-Qādirī Būtashīsh) on Almoravid society and on the feudal question in Umayyad al-Andalus, Maḥmūd Ismāʿīl ʿAbd al-Rāziq’s (often referred to as Maḥmūd Ismāʿīl) class-based, Marxian analysis of medieval Islamic history, ʿIzz al-Dīn Mūsā’s foundational work on the economic history of the Islamic West under the Almoravids and Almohads, and Saʿīd Binḥamāda’s remarkable study on water in al-Andalus.3 Suffice it to say that at present any scholar wishing to specialize in the history and civilization of the medieval Islamic West must be familiar not only with secondary literature produced in the traditional European research languages of the field (mainly French, Spanish, and English) but also with the substantial body of contemporary Arabic studies.











A Summary of the Contents 

Chapter 1 is possibly the first overview of the Iraqi school of Assyriology from its foundation in the 1940s by the great philologist and archaeologist Ṭāhā Bāqir down to the present. We see that, despite extremely difficult circumstances, the discipline continues to grow as new departments are founded, more scholars than ever before enter the field, and an impressive body of dissertations and published works covering all the major branches of the field are produced. Chapter 2 discusses the development of the field of Egyptology in Egypt. We learn, contrary to what some in the West may imagine, that already in the second half of the nineteenth century Egyptian scholars such as Aḥmad Kamāl had begun serious study of the archaeology, history, and languages of ancient Egypt and that colonial officials during the period of British domination did everything in their power to hamper these efforts, including preventing the publication of the first ancient Egyptian-Arabic dictionary and removing native Egyptians from positions in the antiquities service in order to preserve it as a monopoly for Europeans. 











Nonetheless, Egyptian Egyptology survived these setbacks and it has grown and flourished since the end of colonial rule in 1952. In recent decades tens of thousands of inscriptions in various ancient North and South Arabian dialects have been discovered throughout the Arabian Peninsula as well as in neighboring lands such as Jordan and Syria. Scholarship is still in the early stages of understanding and exploiting these valuable sources, which have the potential to shed a great deal of new light on what we know about the history of the Near East, the development of the Semitic languages (especially Arabic), and the cultural and historical milieu out of which Islam arose. Chapter 3 focuses on the contributions made by researchers from throughout the Arab world to the study of the epigraphy and archaeology of ancient Yemen. Chapters 4 and 5 are concerned with the study of Antiquity in Morocco and Algeria, respectively. Major themes in the development of the disciplines of archaeology and ancient history in the post-independence Maghrib are the process of decolonization of these fields, the quest to establish a uniquely North African perspective on the region’s ancient past, and the replacement of French by Arabic as the principal language of instruction and publication in the universities. The last four decades have seen a great increase in the number of archaeology and history departments in the region and a considerable body of ma and PhD theses concerned with the pre-Islamic period has been produced. One of the weaknesses confronting the field of ancient studies in Morocco and Algeria is that the study of primary source languages (Latin, Greek, Phoenician, and Lybic, as well as of Afro-Asiatic linguistics, which is essential for understanding the context of the latter two languages) is largely absent from the university curricula. Chapter 6 explores Classical Studies in the Arab world. Egypt has a rich tradition of Greek and Latin studies extending back to the 1940s thanks in part to the pioneering efforts of Tāhā Ḥusayn, one of the greatest Arab intellectuals and authors of the twentieth century. Since that time thousands of studies have been produced in Arabic covering all facets of Greco-Roman Civilization. The author emphasizes that Classics in the Arab world holds a particular interest as an example of Classics in a non-Western context in a region which was once part of the Classical world and whose culture has been profoundly influenced by Greek thought as a result of the Greco-Arabic translation movement of the ʿAbbāsid period. Chapter 7 is the first account of Byzantine Studies in an Arab context.








 The focus again is on Egypt, for though there are individual Byzantinists in some of the other Arab countries, only in Egypt does there exist what we may call, for lack of a better term, a “school” of Byzantine Studies that has developed continuously from the middle of the twentieth century down to the present. In this chapter we learn about the changing concerns and preoccupations of Egyptian Byzantinists. The author explains how this field has evolved from a focus in its early years on Byzantine history seen from the perspective of Arab-Islamic civilization (Muslim-Byzantine relations) to an increased concern in recent years with what he calls “pure Byzantine studies”, including such topics as the internal history of the Byzantine Empire, its society, culture, and economy, and its relations with non-Muslim powers. He also provides us with valuable information about how the study of the medieval period in general (Byzantine, Islamic, and Western European) has been approached in the major Egyptian universities. The Tunisian scholar Hichem Djaït (Hishām Jaʿayṭ) is one of the most famous living Arab historians and he is also well known in Western specialist circles for his important studies on early Islamic history, some of which were published in French and translated into English. In his works he has explored topics such as the life of the Prophet Muḥammad, the Great Fitna (Civil War), the early Islamic city, and early Islamic provincial administration in North Africa, taking a standpoint that is critical both of traditional historical scholarship in the Arab world and of orientalist scholarship. 











Chapter 8 discusses the groundbreaking work of Djaït as well as the historiographical “school” which he has established in Tunisia, where a number of distinguished historians who were trained by him have produced a body of important and innovative work on the formative period of Islamic history. Chapter 9 presents an overview of modern Arabic historical scholarship on the Umayyad period. Different trends in historical writing are analyzed, including the Arab nationalist, sectarian Sunni, and sectarian Shīʿī trends as well as the works of “modernist” historians, particularly from North Africa, who have brought a more critical approach to the field. 











This chapter also discusses important new research in Arabic epigraphy, particularly in the Arabian Peninsula, which has resulted in the discovery of many new inscriptions from the early Islamic period (including Umayyad inscriptions) which provide a valuable supplement to the manuscript tradition. Iraq boasts one of the oldest national schools of historiography in the Arab world (along with Egypt and Syria) and many distinguished historians such as ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz al-Dūrī, Jawād ʿAlī, and Ṣāliḥ Aḥmad al-ʿAlī, to name only a few. 











Chapter 10 traces the development of the Iraqi historiographical school from its origins in the early twentieth century until the present through a series of vignettes of prominent historians who are representative of some of the dominant trends in Iraqi history-writing. Close attention is also paid to the influence of political events on the historians and their work. Thus, we see how the anticolonialist, Arab nationalist, Baathist, Marxist and, more recently, following the American invasion of 2003, sectarian religious trends have impacted historical scholarship in Iraq. Chapter 11 looks at the remarkable scholarship that has been done by a group of Moroccan scholars on the economic and social history of the Maghrib and al-Andalus during the medieval period. The origins of this historiographical movement extend back to the 1970s and 1980s when the Egyptian historian Maḥmūd Ismāʿīl ʿAbd al-Rāziq was a visiting professor at the University of Fez. Several of his Moroccan students themselves became prominent historians of the medieval Islamic West, and they in turn have trained a third generation of historians who are concerned with socio-economic history. These scholars have produced important studies on such topics as economic history, class relations, the effects of natural disasters and war on society, marginalized groups, and mentalities in medieval North Africa and al-Andalus.












Chapter 12 concerns the study of medieval history in the Algerian universities since independence in 1962. The Algerian historiographical school is one of the younger national schools in the Arab world and it has grown enormously since independence. At the time of independence there was only one university in the country, the University of Algiers, and the only language of education was French. Today there are over 100 institutions of higher education in Algeria and the humanities and social sciences have been fully Arabized. The author of the chapter discusses the processes of decolonization and Arabization and also undertakes an analysis of the large corpus of ma and PhD dissertations in medieval Islamic history that has been produced by the Algerian universities in recent decades. This analysis reveals the topics and fields of research that have received the most attention from contemporary Algerian medievalists as well as those that have been relatively neglected. The Mamluks and the Mamluk period (1250–1517) have received a great deal of attention in Western Islamicist scholarship in recent years, perhaps more so than any other medieval Islamic dynasty. Surprisingly, until now no attempt has been made to present an overview of the vast and diverse body of Arabic scholarship on the Mamluk period.













 Chapter 13 gives a comprehensive survey of the Mamluks in modern Arabic historiography from the late nineteenth century to the present. A wide range of studies are considered, not only from Egypt and Bilād al-Shām, but also from the Gulf states, Iraq, and the Maghrib. These works span the fields of political, economic, social, and cultural history. Attention is also given to the place of Mamluk history within Egyptian history departments and how the Mamluk period is viewed in relation to the preceding dynasties. There is no question that this chapter fills a major gap in our understanding of the development and present state of the field of Mamluk studies. Chapter 14 complements the preceding chapter by focusing on the study of the art and architecture of the Mamluk period in Egypt. The history and development of this field of study is surveyed from its origins to the present, followed by a detailed discussion of how Islamic art and architecture are taught in Egyptian universities and careful analysis of the research produced (especially theses). The author provides us with a good picture of the state of the field in Egypt today, along with its strengths, weaknesses and future prospects. In general, Western orientalists have tended to be more interested in relations between Europe and North Africa in the medieval period rather than relations between the Maghrib and the Mashriq.4 In the Arab countries, by contrast, the topic of Maghribī–Mashriqī relations has been a major theme for medievalists since the 1940s, for obvious historical and cultural reasons, and a great deal of work has been and continues to be published on this subject. 












Chapter 15 presents a thorough survey of the literature on this topic from across the Arab world, covering all aspects of Maghribī–Mashriqī contacts such as diplomatic relations, intellectual and cultural relations, trade, travel, and migrations of tribes. The final chapter in this volume, Chapter 16, is about the study of Medieval (non-Byzantine) Europe in the Arab world. Academics specializing in Medieval Europe can be found in most of the Arab countries today, particularly in Egypt, where there is a tradition of Latin studies in the larger universities (both in the classics and history departments) and as a consequence, nearly all students of medieval European history there have had some formal instruction in the language and a few have become quite proficient in it and have done extensive research in the Latin primary sources. The present condition and state of the discipline are discussed, and the author analyzes the output of Arab researchers in this field (including theses, monographs, articles, translation of primary and secondary sources, etc.) in order to draw some conclusions about their major interests and preoccupations.







Concluding Remarks It would be very unfortunate if, rather than existing in one large global community, each of the various disciplines discussed in this book is allowed to bifurcate into largely separate communities of Western and non-Western scholars with limited contact between the two. Such a situation leads to inefficiency (for example there is the problem on both sides of scholars “reinventing the wheel” due to being unaware of research published in another language) and hampers dialogue and exchange of ideas, essential conditions for the growth and development of any field of scholarship. The present volume is a modest attempt to create a bridge between the Arab and Western communities of pre-modern historians and it is the sincere hope of the editor and all of the contributors that their work will encourage others on both sides to take the initiative in opening new avenues for collaboration, dialogue, and exchange of ideas and research.















Notes on Contributors 

Emad Abou-Ghazi (PhD Cairo University, 1995) is an Egyptian historian and archivist and Professor Emeritus of Medieval Arabic Documents in the faculty of Arts, Cairo University. He has worked in the fields of history, archives, diplomatics, and cultural policies since 1976. He has written more than 60 articles and seven books in Arabic including: Ṭūmān Bāy al-Sulṭān al-Shahīd (1999); Taṭawwur al-Ḥiyāza al-Zirāʿiyya fī Miṣr Zaman al-Mamālīk al-Jarākisa (2000); Ḥikāyat Thawrat 1919 (2009); 1517 Al-Iḥtilāl al-ʿUthmānī li Miṣr wa Suqūṭ Dawlat al-Mamālīk (2019). 






Al-Amin Abouseada (PhD Birmingham University, 2000) is professor of Medieval History at Tanta University, Egypt, and currently visiting professor of Medieval History at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia. His research interests include: Byzantine history, Byzantine-Muslim relations, relics, Medieval Poland and Christian-Muslim polemics. He has several publications on these topics.








 Youcef Aibeche (Doctorat d’état, Mentouri University, Constantine, Algeria, 2007) is professor of ancient history at the University of Sétif 2 where he is also vice-rector of postgraduate studies and research. He is a specialist on Late Antiquity whose research focuses on the transition from the ancient to the Islamic period in North Africa. He is responsible for the archaeological mapping project of the Sétifienne region, co-director of the archaeological research project of Lambaesis (with the Algerian Ministry of Culture cnrs-ens) since 2014, and he directs projects at other sites such as Cuicul, Milev and the prehistoric site of Ain el-Hennech near Sétif. 







Sidi Mohammed Alaioud (PhD Moulay Ismail University, Meknes, 2005) is professor at the École Normale Supérieure (ens) at Mohammed v University in Rabat. His research focuses on urbanization and architectural development in the cities of preIslamic Morocco. His publications include Mudun wa Marākiz al-Maghrib al-Qadīm (2015); Al-Taṭawwur al-Ḥaḍārī li Walīlī min al-Fatra al-Mūriyya ilā alFatra al-Islāmiyya: Musāhama fī Dirāsat Mudun al-Maghrib (2015); Min Salā ilā Shāla: Dhākirat Madīna (2nd ed. 2020).





Abdulhadi Alajmi (PhD Durham University, 2004) is professor of history at Kuwait University, where he was also chair of the history department and assistant dean of academic affairs. He specializes in early Islamic history and historiography, and the Umayyad period in particular. In 2020 he received the prestigious pan-Arab award for historical studies Shawāmikh al-Muʾarrikhīn al-ʿArab from the Union of Arab Historians (Ittiḥād al-Muʾarrikhīn al-ʿArab) in Cairo. He has published more than 30 studies in English and Arabic including Political Legitimacy in Early Islam: Al-Awzāʿī’s Interactions with the Umayyad and ʿAbbasid States (2009); “ʿUlama and caliphs new understanding of the “God’s Caliph” term” in Journal of Islamic Law and Culture (2011); Al-Brājmātiyyūn fī al-Qarn al-Hijrī al-Awwal (Cairo, 2019).










 Allaoua Amara (PhD University of Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, 2002) is a historian of the medieval Islamic Maghrib. He teaches in the History Department of Emir Abdelkader University in Constantine. He is an associate researcher at the National Center for Prehistoric, Anthropological and Historical Research (cnrpah, Algiers) and the National Center for Scientific Research (cnrs, Paris). He is the author of a number of books, including Dirāsāt fī Tārīkh al-Jazāʾir wa al-Gharb al-Islāmī (2nd ed., 2016); L’histoire de l’Algérie dans la recherche historique en France (2010), Madīnat Qusanṭīna (2016), and numerous articles. 










Lotfi Ben Miled (PhD University of Tunis, 2009) is assistant professor of medieval history at the University of Tunis (Manouba). He is particularly interested in relations between the Maghrib and the Mashriq in the period from 1030 to 1530 ce. His publications include Ifrīqīya wa al-Mashriq al-Mutawassiṭī min Awāsiṭ al-Qarn 5 h./11 m. ilā Maṭlaʿ al-Qarn 10 h./16m. (Tunis, 2011); “Tracking down the Hafsid Diplomats all the way to the Turco-Mamluk Border 1487–1491” in Mamluk Cairo, a Crossroads for Embassies (Leiden, 2019). 








Brahim El Kadiri Boutchich (PhD Moulay Ismail University, Meknes, 1991) is professor of history at the University of Meknes. He specializes in the history of the Maghrib and alAndalus in the Islamic period. He has previously taught in Oman and he has been a visiting professor in several other Arab countries. He has published dozens of studies on social history and the history of mentalities in the medieval Islamic West including Al-Muhammashūn fī Tārīkh al-Gharb al-Islāmī: Qirāʾat al-Tārīkh min al-Asfal (2014).

 





Usama Gad (PhD Heidelberg University, 2016) is assistant professor of papyrology and Classics at ʿAyn Shams University in Cairo. His interests include Greek and Latin language pedagogy, papyrology, Greco-Roman Egypt, the medieval Greek-Arabic and Arabic-Latin translation movements, modern Arabic translations of the Classics, the history of Classical Studies in Egypt, Digital Classics, Orientalism, and Classics and Colonialism. His publications include “Who Was Who in the Aristocracy of Byzantine Oxyrhynchus” in Proceedings of the 27th International Congress of Papyrology, Warsaw, 29 July–3 August 2013 (Warsaw 2016); “Sale on Delivery for Reeds,” in Archiv für Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete (2014).









 Azeddine Guessous (PhD El Jadida, Morocco, 2002) is currently professor of history and civilization at Chouaib Doukkali University in El Jadida. He specializes in the history of the Maghrib and al-Andalus during the Islamic period. His publications include: Mawqif al-Raʿiyya min al-Sulṭa al-Siyāsiyya fī al-Maghrib wa alAndalus ʿalā ʿAhd al-Murābiṭīn: Dirāsa fī ʿIlm al-Ijtimāʿ al-Siyāsī (2014); Al-Sulṭa al-Murābiṭiyya: al-Ramzī wa al-Mutakhayyal (2019). 









Fayza Haikal (PhD Oxford, 1965) is currently professor emerita of Egyptology at the American University in Cairo, where she continues her research on many aspects of Ancient Egyptian culture and their transmission to the modern world. She previously taught in the Faculty of Archaeology of Cairo University and was visiting professor at the University of Paris iv- La Sorbonne, at Charles University in Prague, and at the University of Rome “La Sapienza”. She was the first Egyptian woman to work in Nubia during the international campaign for the salvage of its monuments in the 1960s, and in the 1990s she directed the international campaign for the salvage of archeological sites in North Sinai during the digging of the Peace Canal. Her recent publications include “De la natte au Tapis Rouge. Symbolisme de la natte hier et aujourd’hui”, in Du Sinai au Soudan: itinéraire d’une égyptologue. Mélanges offerts au Professeur Dominique Valbelle, (2017); (with Amr Omar) “Egyptology in Egypt: the founding institutions,” in Navratilova, H., Th. L. Gertzen, A. Dodson, A. Bednarsk (eds.) Towards a History of Egyptology: Proceedings of the Egyptological Section of the 8th ESHS Conference in London (2018).







Hani Hamza (PhD Cairo University, 2004) is an independent scholar who lives in Cairo, where he researches, writes, and lectures on the history of Mamluk architecture and other Mamluk-related topics. His academic articles in English have been published in the journal Mamluk Studies Review (msr) in Chicago, by the auc Press in Cairo, and by Brill in Leiden. He has also published a monograph in English on the Northern Cemetery of Cairo and three Arabic books on the general history of the Mamluk sultanate. 








Laith M. Hussein (PhD Philipps-University Marburg, Altorientalistik, Center for Near and Middle Eastern Studies, 2006) specializes in Cuneiform Studies. He is currently Director General of the State Board of Antiquities and Heritage of Iraq. He previously taught in and chaired the department of archaeology in the College of Arts at the University of Baghdad where he was also Head of the Consulting Office and Vice-Dean for Scientific Affairs and Graduate Studies. He has participated in many international conferences, seminars and workshops and published numerous articles in the areas of Assyriology and Mesopotamian archaeology. 







Nasir al-Kaabi (PhD University of Kufa and University of Tehran, 2008) is professor of history at the University of Kufa, Iraq. He was a post-doctoral research fellow at the University of Toronto (2014–2016). He specializes in the history of the Sasanian Empire. His publications include: Musammā al-ʿIrāq wa Tukhūmuhu fī al-Mudawwanāt al-Bahlawiyya al-Sāsāniyya: Dirāsa fī al-Tārīkh al-Thaqāfī wa al-Īdiyūlūjī li al-Mafhūm (2018); A Short Chronicle on the End of the Sasanian Empire and Early Islam: 590–660 (2016); Jadaliyyat al-Dawla wa al-Dīn fī al-ʿAṣr al-Sāsānī (2010); Al-Dawla al-Sāsāniyya fī al-Maṣādir al-ʿArabiyya: Dirāsa fī al-Tārīkh al-Siyāsī (2008). 









Khaled Kchir (PhD University of Tunis, 1994) is professor of medieval history at the University of Tunis, where he has also directed the Laboratoire du Monde arabo-islamique médiéval since 2013 and served as vice-president of the university from 2017 to 2020. His research interests include the transmission of knowledge in the later medieval period, medieval Arabic biographical dictionaries, Ibn Khaldūn, Arabic codicology and diplomatics. His latest works concern the Berbers and Persians viewed by Ibn Khaldūn.






Mohammed Maraqten (PhD Philipps-University Marburg, Semitic and Ancient Near Eastern Studies, 1987), born in Palestine and based in Germany, is a specialist of Ancient Near Eastern languages and cultures. He is now affiliated with the University of Heidelberg, Germany, and he also works for the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. He has conducted archaeological excavations and surveys in Jordan, Bahrain, Yemen, Oman, Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia, and published intensively on the cultures and epigraphy of Ancient Arabia and especially on ancient South Arabian inscriptions. His recent work includes Altsüdarabische Texte auf Holzstäbchen: Epigraphische und kulturhistorische Untersuchungen (Beiruter Texte und Studien Nr. 103), Orient-Institut/Beirut; Würzburg: Ergon (2014). 







Amr Omar (PhD Cairo University, 2020) is curator of the Egyptology and Coptology collection at the Rare Books and Special Collections Library of the American University in Cairo. He has participated in many archaeological projects such as Eternal Egypt, Archaeological Map of Egypt, Mediterranean Defense Architecture Preservation Project, Theban Mapping Project, and currently the Egyptian Archaeological Database Project. His publications include “Battle of Qadesh in Ramesses II’s Memory: A Brief Note,” in Abgadiyat (2014); “Note on Beth Shan Stela of Ramesses II,” Annales du Service des Antiquités de l’Égypte (2019); (with Salima Ikram) “Egypt” in Bednarski, A., A. Dodson & S. Ikram (eds.) A History of World Egyptology (2020). 









Abdelaziz Ramadan (PhD ʿAyn Shams University, 2003) is a historian of early Byzantium and its relations with the Arabs. He taught at ʿAyn Shams University from 2003 to 2018 and is now Professor of medieval history in King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia. He has conducted research abroad at the University of Rome “La Sapienza” (2002–2003) and at the Freie Universität Berlin (2013). He is the author of a number of Arabic books including Al-Marʾa wa al-Mujtamaʿ fī al-Imbrāṭūriyyat al-Bīzanṭiyya (2005); Al-Ṭarīq ilā Bīzanṭa: Dirāsāt ḥawl al-Fikr wa al-Dīn wa al-Siyāsa fī Sharq al-Imbrāṭūriyya al-Rūmāniyya al-Mutaʾakhkhira (2017); and articles in English including “Treatment of Arab Prisoners of War in Byzantium”, in Annales Islamologiques (2009); “Arab Apostates in Byzantium”, in Byzantina Symmeikta (2019). 












Link 











Press Here 











Download PDF | (Handbook of Oriental Studies 13) Michel Jacq-Hergoualc'H, Victoria Hobson - The Malay Peninsula_ Crossroads of the Maritime Silk Road (100 BC - 1300 AD)-Brill Academic Publishers (2001).

Download PDF | (Handbook of Oriental Studies 13) Michel Jacq-Hergoualc'H, Victoria Hobson - The Malay Peninsula_ Crossroads of the Maritime Silk Road (100 BC - 1300 AD)-Brill Academic Publishers (2001).

788 Pages 




ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The research that led to this book could not have been accomplished without a great deal of help and collaboration. We wish to thank the entire team of the Muzium Negara of Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia, who made it possible for us to re-examine the archaeological remains of South Kedah and to excavate one of the monuments there. Special thanks are due to Dr. Adi bin Haji Taha, one of the Directors of the Muzium, who was able to find efficient solutions to many practical problems, to Dr. Othman Mohd. Yatim, who assisted in this effort, to Mr. Kamaruddin bin Zakaria, curator of the Muzium Arkeologi of Merbok and the sites in South Kedah, who welcomed us to the archaeological areas under his protection and to the museum of which he is the Director. Our friendship and gratitude go to Mr. Abdul Latib bin Ariffin, who made the archaeological survey with us, to Limah who made beautiful maps for us, and to Sanim Ahmad for his splendid photographs, as well as to all the other members of the Kedah team with whom we sweated and 'scratched' over a period of several months. We express our warmest thanks to Professor Dato' Dr. Nik Hassan Shuhaimi Nik Abdul Rahman, who kindly agreed to share his extensive knowledge of this subject with us. 







We are also indebted to many people in Thailand, in particular to Drs. Amara and Tharapong Srisuchat, archaeologists from the Fine Arts Department in Bangkok, who guided and accompanied us on our visit to the archaeological sites of peninsular Thailand. We cannot adequately thank Pakpadee Yukongdi and Pornthip Puntukowit, also archaeologists from the Fine Arts Department, for so generously sharing their intimate knowledge of the site of Yarang. We are most grateful for the facilities provided by the directors of many national museums to enable us to take urgently-needed photographs of certain objects related to our work: the Museum of Bangkok, and the Museums of Lopburi, Chaiya, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Songkhla, Phuket, and the University Museum of Pattani. 






Finally, we owe an enormous debt of gratitude to Professor Thiva Supajanya of the Faculty of Science of the Chulalongkom University of Bangkok, and to his assistant Wichapan Krisanopol, for their inestimable work on the topographical evolution of the shores of the Malay Peninsula; the presentation of many of the maps that illustrate this book and the observations derived from them are entirely the fruit of their labours. 






INTRODUCTION 

No doubt it was ambitious to undertake a study on a subject that so many researchers before me had laboured to clarify through diligent work and from differing points of view; but I have not felt presumptuous in doing so, since it has come about as the natural outcome of my research. Certain opportunities led me to begin this study in South Kedah almost ten years ago, and once the work was completed, it seemed a logical next step to go to Southern Thailand to see what I might find there that would correspond to the picture that had emerged in this part of Malaysia: a civilization of entrepot ports developed within the framework of a movement of international trade involving every Asian culture beginning in the first centuries of the Christian era. I found elements that were very similar to those I had just studied, and others that were very different; I believe that including these in the study adds depth and richness to the subject.









 I realized at the very outset of this project that the centres of commercial exchange that had evolved from this international trade were so diverse and so unevenly distributed that the civilization as a whole could not be explained without recourse to both physical and climatic geography. Their only common denominator was the entrepot ports that received the ships. I therefore focused my study on archaeological remains of a commercial order linked to these ports. Because the second important type of remains encountered in this study consists of a jumble of religious works of entirely Indian inspiration, it seemed necessary at a later stage to specify what is intended here by the use of the overworked and variously interpreted word 'Indianization' . It was then appropriate to undertake a stylistic and chronological assessment of these remains, placing them within the framework of the political entities that either created or received the original works. In this connection, the Chinese texts provided some useful information.










 This investigation then made it possible to examine different sites, one by one, considering periods which, though sometimes relatively long, reveal historic rhythms. These rhythms, while totally foreign to the Peninsula itself, since they are related to the succession of Chinese, Indian and Middle Eastern dynasties, were nonetheless indispensable to the prosperity of the Peninsula. Indeed, unlike certain other regions of Southeast Asia such as Cambodia, the Menam Chao Phaya Basin, or Central Java, whose chiefly rural activities sheltered them somewhat from the great upheavals of Asian history, the Malay Peninsula was a crossroads open to every influence, and thus, a priori, exposed to every repercussion. At one time or another, inevitably, all the tradespeople of the Asian world passed through the Peninsula as they followed the different itineraries of what can be called the Maritime Silk Trade Route that linked the two extreme points of Asia. 







The history of these different peoples was therefore bound to have vital consequences for the destiny of the Peninsula. In the local context, we encounter the political entity represented by Srlvijaya, persuasively defined at the beginning of this century as an all-powerful thalassocracy that had managed to dominate the banks of the Malay Peninsula for more than five hundred years, from the end of the seventh century. Here I felt it was important to discuss this political concept in the light of a recent reinterpretation of the texts that gave rise to it. Among other things, a detailed stylistic study of the numerous works of art discovered along these banks should permit an informed opinion on the equally widespread idea of a distinct Srlvijayan artistic style, a concept which may be as much open to question as the previous one. 





 



Link 











Press Here 










عربي باي