الأربعاء، 24 أبريل 2024

Download PDF | Sultan Muhammad Al Fatih, The Conqueror of Constantinople The Fall of the West and the East, By Ali Muhammad Al Salaabi, Al-Firdous London, 2009.

Download PDF | Sultan Muhammad Al Fatih, The Conqueror of Constantinople  The Fall of the West and the East,  By Ali Muhammad Al Salaabi, Al-Firdous London, 2009.

220 Pages




Introduction

Verily, all praise is due to Allah 8. We praise Him, seek His help and ask for His forgiveness. We seek refuge in Allah & from the evil in our own souls and from our sinful deeds. Whoever Allah #& guides, no one can mislead. And whoever Allah  allows to go astray, no one can guide. I bear witness that there is none worthy of worship except Allah , the One, having no partner. And I bear witness that Muhammad & is His servant and messenger , €O believers! Have fear of Allah according to His right and die not save as Muslims.}

















€O mankind! Have fear of your Lord, the One who created you from one soul and created from it its mate and from them spread many men and women. And fear Allah from whom you demand your mutual rights and [do not cut off ties of} kinship. Surely, Allah is Ever an All-Watcher over you.}















{O Believers! Have fear of Allah and always speak the truth. He will direct you to righteous deeds and will forgive you your sins. And whosoever obeys Allah and His Messenger has indeed achieved a great achievement.)

O my Lord, all praise for You as it suits Your Majesty and Sovereignty; all praise is for You in a manner which pleases You; all praise is for You until You are pleased, and all praise to for You after You are pleased.















When the book “The Ottoman State: The factors of its renaissance and the reasons for its downfall” was presented at the international book fairs, there was a great deal of interest, and so I received many comments about it. Many writers, from all over the world, have agreed that there should be just one book solely about Muhammad al-Faatih, and the idea was also welcomed by the publisher. So, I started to undertake the proposal, and by God’s Will, if things go as they are planned, other titles about some of the heroes who made a great impact in our glorious history will follow shortly.


This book talks about Muhammad al-Faatih, the liberator of Constantinople and the defeater of the Romans. It is also about his great grandfathers who lived with Islam and died for the sake of raising the Word of Allah high. This book discusses the biographies of ‘Uthman the first, Urkhan, Murad the first, Bayzid the first, Muhammad Halabi, Murad the second, and Muhammad al-Faatih. It details their attributes, the course they adopted, and the way they followed the rules, set out by Allah 4, to build their state. It shows that the liberation (conquest) of Constantinople was the result of the accumulated efforts of scholars, leaders and soldiers. The reader will learn that the Ottoman renaissance, during the reign of Sultan Muhammad _al-Faatih, encompassed scientific, political, economic and military fields. The characteristics of victory and governance should exist in a nation and its leader, in order for a state to prevail. Allah 8 says:















<There is in their stories instruction for men endued with understanding. It is not an invented tale, but a confirmation of what came before it; a detailed


exposition of all things and a Guide and a Mercy to any such as believe. >!


This book will enlighten the reader about some of the ordinances set by Allah ®& in all societies, in the development of nations and in the building of states. It explains the effect of ruling by the Laws of Allah 4 had on the Ottoman state, during the reign of the Sultan Muhammad al-Faatih. It invites the reader to ponder on the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Prophet, to understand the science of the revival of nations and the foundation of states, so that one may attain a sound knowledge about the effects of the laws set by Allah 4. The Book of Allah mentions that these laws were given in all societies; Allah 4 says: <Allah wants to make things clear to you, to show you the ordinances of those before you, and to turn to you in Mercy; Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.}'


The Book of Allah has instructed us to go and see the remains of those societies, left in their settings; Allah %& says:

(Many were the ways of life that have passed away before you: travel through the earth and see what the end of those who rejected truth was. Here is a plain statement to men, a guidance and instruction to those who fear Allah)”


The Book of Allah has instructed us to understand those ways with insight and perception; Allah &% says: «Say: “Behold all that is in the heavens and on earth”; but neither Signs nor Warners profit those who disbelieve. Do they then expect anything but what happened in the days of the men who passed away before them? Say: “You wait then: for I too will wait with you.”»


The Sunnah of Allah #§ is distinguished by some principle characteristics, such as that they are predestined; they do not change; they are carelessly ignored by the stubborn, but they benefit the pious; they are applied to both good and corrupt people.


In this study I have focused on the effects and signs of ruling by the Laws of Allah 8, during the reign of Muhammad alFaatih. I have referred to signs, such as the granting of authority and the consolidation of power; security and establishment (of a good society); victory and prevalence (of stability); might and honour; the spreading of virtues and the elimination of vice.


I have commented on the attributes of Muhammad al-Faatih and his civilized and urban activities. I have mentioned his testament to his son, when he was dying, which truly reflects his way of life, the principles which he believed in and wished his successors to follow. I have shown their sources and basis, and I am convinced that our nation’s leaders are most definitely in need of studying, understanding and putting into practice these principles. I have discussed the spurious arguments which were directed at Muhammad alFaatih, such as the one fabricated by the English historian, Edward Shepherd Chrissie, in his book “The history of the Ottoman Turks’, in which he defamed the character of Muhammad al-Faatih, out of hatred and jealousy of the glorious Islamic conquest. The American Encyclopaedia, printed in 1980, also expressed its crusader like hatred of Islam, and claimed that Muhammad al-Faatih enslaved most of the Christians of Constantinople, taking them to the market of the city of Adrianople, where they were sold as Slaves! I have denied all these spurious arguments and allegations against Muhammad al-Faatih, with sound and sharp proof using historical facts, which have proved that Muhammad al-Faatih was very compassionate and kind with the people of Constantinople. He ordered his soldiers to treat prisoners with mercy, and he liberated many of them with his own money. He met with priests, giving them assurances concearning their beliefs and churches. I have explained that the merciful behaviour of Muhammad alFaatih was due to his adherence to the guidance of pure Islam, taking as an example the conduct of the Prophet # and the rightly guided Caliphs, with those ahl-udh-Dhimmah (freed non-Muslims living under Muslim Rule) after him, whose publications explained all their kindness and tolerance towards their enemies.


No one could deny the great role of the Ottomans when the Muslims of North Africa called for their help, after the beginning of the Spanish invasion of Africa, headed by Cardinal Jamines. The Ottoman authority sent the great Mujahid, Khayr Eddin Barbarosa, to roam along the Mediterranean, and clean the whole of the North African coast from those invaders, until they were safe from evil. 















Constantinople, of which the Prophet #2 had given good tidings about its liberation, was conquered by Muhammad al-Faatih, who had an audacious plan of utmost subtlety, great military preparation and accurate execution. He transported his ships by land on logs, and then rolled them down to the sea behind the Byzantine lines, taking them by surprise. This led to the defeat of all the fleets of the enemy and the liberation of the city of Constantinople, which later became the capital of the Caliphate. It is now called “Istanbul” in a manner to hide the history of Sultan Muhammad al-Faatih, who spent days and nights in the tents or riding horses, and never knew the comfort of cities nor palaces’.


I have mentioned the Ottomans, with both their positive and negative attributes, in my book “The Ottoman State: The Factors of Renaissance and the Causes of Downfall”. However, in this book, I have discussed the biography of Muhammad al-Faatih and the factors of renaissance during his reign.


Some intellectuals, who were influenced by the western methods of historical writing, criticised my series about the Islamic history of North Africa, saying: “Why should faith be mixed with history? What is the relation between a leader’s attributes and history? Why is the relationship between the ruling by Allah’s Laws and history important?”


I reply — and success is from Allah # - that the method of writing Islamic history and interpreting its events relies on the basis of Islamic concepts. It takes the Islamic faith and its obligations as the basis of its methodology and its interpretation of historical events. Dr. Akram Diya’ has said: “The interpretation of Islamic history is derived from the Islamic concept to the universe, mankind, and life in general. It is based on the belief in Allah 8%, His Books, His Messengers, the Last Day, and the Divine Decree, whether good and bad it is from Allah 4. It does not go beyond the Islamic faith, and it is also based upon the principles of conduct of the first Islamic society, a fact which distinguishes the course of Islamic history from that of secular world history, due to the effect of the Divine Revelation within it.””


Therefore, in order to interpret Islamic history, it is necessary to refer to its Islamic sources in order to understand the motivating factors of behaviour in that society, which had been constructed and nurtured upon the Islamic Shari ‘ah. Islamic teachings, commands and prohibitions directed most of its development, with its propagation and Jihad for the Sake of Allah 8%, in educational, professional and social fields, as well as in the internal and external affairs of the established Islamic society.


In order to reach an authentic and real adapted interpretation of the development of Islamic history, we need to know and understand the elements which formed the society and governed its progress, in addition to the foundation of its concepts and culture. We need to compare this historical progress with the Islamic legal commands and prohibitions. We need to know how many of them were linked to those commands and requirements, and how many of them deviated from them, so that we could learn the extent of the impact of Islam on mankind, and the deprivation of other societies, which had deviated from the Shari ‘ah of Allah #. We also may recognise Allah’s Benevolence and Mercy to humanity; for He 8 brought them out of darkness into light, from oppression to justice, from misery to happiness, from fear and anxiety to peace and security; He # says: <Alif. Lam. Ra. (This is) a Scripture which We have revealed unto you (Muhammad) that thereby you might bring forth mankind from darkness unto light, by the permission of their Lord, unto the Path of the Mighty, the Owner of Praise)’


The method which I have adopted in these historical studies is the same method used in the Qur’an for presenting narratives. It is for this reason that I have focused on highlighting the attributes of leaders, issues of faith and the foundations upon which nations were established and revived.


In the Qur’an, we are presented with the story of Prophet David (Dawud) 33), the devout Muslim leader, whose attributes are an example to any righteous ruler, showing a way to achieve perfect happiness in this world and in the Hereafter; Allah & says, addressing Prophet Muhammad : «Have patience at what they say and remember Our


Servant Dawud, a man of strength, for he always turned to Allah)’


The attributes of Prophet David (Dawud) 38), mentioned in this Verse, are as follows:


(1) Patience: Allah # had ordered Prophet Muhammad # to adopt the example of Prophet Dawud in regard to his patience, which showed his obedience to Allah #


(2) Servitude: Allah 4 described him as (Our Servant}, using the plural form to express Himself, gloriously. Being described as having been in a state of servitude to Allah & 1s the utmost honour, just as with Prophet Muhammad #2, when Allah 4 mentioned him at the beginning of Surat al-Isra’:

«Glory to Allah Who did take His Servant” for Journey by night...)°


(3) The power to execute Allah’s Commands <a man of strength}.

(4) The return to Allah 4, in total obedience to all His Commands, as Allah 4 says: €for he always turned to Allah}.


The description of Prophet Dawud 8! as a ruler who had the power to adhere to Allah’s Commands and was always turning to Allah 8 was proof of his correct understanding of Allah 8, a fact that allowed him to worship Allah in a truly devotional way.


Allah 8 mentioned other attributes of Prophet Dawud 3% and the trials he went through, saying:

¢ And has the news of the litigants reached you? When they climbed over the wall into (his) Mihrab (a praying place or a private room,). When they entered in upon Dawood (David), he was terrified of them, they said: "Fear not! (We are) two litigants, one of whom has wronged the other, therefore judge between us with truth, and treat us not with injustice, and guide us to the Right Way. Verily, my brother (in religion) has ninety nine ewes, while I have (only) one ewe, and he says: "Hand it over to me, and he overpowered me in speech." (Dawood (David)) said (immediately without listening to the opponent): 'He has wronged you in demanding your ewe in addition to his ewes. And, verily, many partners oppress one another, except those who believe and do righteous good deeds, and they are few."" And Dawood (David) guessed that We have tried him and he sought Forgiveness of his Lord, and he fell down prostrate and turned (to Allah) in repentance.’


Scholars have mentioned great benefits that may be derived from these verses, as well as many words of wisdom. These verses of trial were followed by Allah’s nomination of Prophet Dawud 3! as a vicegerent on earth, saying:


<O David! We did indeed make you a vicegerent on


earth: so judge between men in truth (and justice), and do not follow the lusts of your heart, for they would mislead you from the Path of Allah. Those who wander astray from the Path of Allah will receive a grievous penalty, because they forgot the Day of Account.)


In the above verse, Allah 8 has given us some basic principles of judging between people:


(1) <So judge between men in truth (and justice)) i.e. judge people with justice, upon which the heavens and the earth were established, which is the first and most important principle of judgment (in governing or ruling).


(2) €And do not follow the lusts of your heart) i.e. do not incline to your own desires when you judge between people, for it will lead you to the Hellfire.


This great verse shows that ruling justly over people is a religious status, which the Messengers of Allah 4 and His righteous servants had adopted. Judging people, in truth, requires having knowledge about religious legal affairs, knowledge of the legal case, and knowledge of the manner in which to apply the legal rule pertaining to it. One who ignores any one of these types of knowledge is not fit to rule, and so is not permitted to undertake such a duty.


This verse suggests that the ruler should be cautious of any inclination towards his whims, while the next verses discuss many important issues of faith in the life of the Muslim:

 













<And We did not create the heavens and the earth and all that is between them in vain. That is the opinion of those who disbelieve, and woe unto those who disbelieve from the Fire! Shall We treat those who believe and do good deeds as those who spread corruption on the earth; or shall We treat the pious as the wicked? (This is) a Scripture that We have revealed unto you; full of blessing, that they may ponder its Revelations, and that men of understanding may reflect)’


The Sol an mentioned Allah’s Gift to Prophet Dawud 

<We bestowed Solomon (Sulaiman) on David (as a son). How excellent a Servant! He was always turning in repentance (toward Allah)}”


Then, there is also reference to the smelting of tron which Prophet Dawud %¢8) practiced:<And We taught him the fashioning of armour coats, to


protect you from your warfare. So will you then be thankful?)' (And assuredly We gave David Grace from Us, (saying): O you hills and birds, echo his psalms of praise! And We made the iron supple unto him, saying: Make long coats


of mail and measure the links (thereof). And do right. I am Seer of what you do)”


This was Allah’s Gift to Prophet Dawud ¢&\, besides his being a Prophet, ruler and vicegerent. Allah %& had bestowed His Servant Dawud with the blessing of knowledge about how to smelt iron from its ore, which is the main element used in building civilisations and states, and settling wars. 











It is this Qur’anic method which I have pursued in my portrait of history, focusing on the character and faith of the leaders, and the methods they adopted, and whether they were close or far from the Judgment of Allah .


This method opposes that of western historians, because it is derived from an Islamic concept of life, the universe, mankind and the course of history, given by the Creator, as exemplified in His Holy Book and the Sunnah of His final Servant and Messenger, Muhammad #&.


This method of historical research would free all those who have been alienated from rational thought by the western systems that were imposed by the colonialists, who tried and still try to keep the Muslims away from their Religion, history and civilisation.


I have received some criticism, from some researchers, from which I have benefited a great deal. So I thank them very much, and I ask Allah # to grant them success in their work, and make us all successful in the service of our Religion and Faith, as can be seen from the glorious history of our Ummah, Ameen.


I have divided this book into four parts: introduction, two chapters and conclusion.


The first chapter comprises of six objects of research articles. The second chapter comprises of six research articles.


Chapter One: The Rise of the Ottoman State and its


Conquests. 1. ‘Uthman, the Founder of the Ottoman State

2. The Sultan Urkhan bin ‘Uthman 3. The Sultan Murad.


4. The Sultan Bayazid the First.


5. The Sultan Muhammad the First. 6. Murad the Second.


Chapter Two: Muhammad al-Faatih and the Conquest of


Constantinople.


1. The Sultan Muhammad al-Faatih.


2. The Spiritual Liberator of Constantinople, Shaikh Shamsuddin, ‘Ak Muhammad bin Hamzah.


3. The effect of the Liberation of Constantinople upon the European and Islamic world.


4. The reasons behind the Liberation of Constantinople.


5. The main attributes of Muhammad al-Faatih.


6. Some of his public works.


Conclusion. Additional Reading.


Finally, I ask Allah 8 to accept this work as undertaken sincerely for His Noble countenance. I ask Him % to reward me for every written letter in this research, accept them in the scale of my good deeds, and reward everyone who helped me to complete this book.


Written by:


The Servant of Allah who seeks His Forgiveness and Grace, ‘Ali Muhammad as-Salabi May Allah #§ forgive him, his parents, and all Muslims, Ameen.























Link
















Press Here


















Download PDF | (Islamic History and Civilization volume 75) Firoozeh Papan-MatinUniversity of Washington - Beyond Death (Islamic History and Civilization)-BRILL (2010).

 Download PDF | (Islamic History and Civilization volume 75) Firoozeh Papan-MatinUniversity of Washington - Beyond Death (Islamic History and Civilization)-BRILL (2010).

257 Pages




ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

There are several people and institutions whose support has made this work possible. In Iran, I had the privilege of presenting my research to ‘Alinagqi Munzavi and his brother Anmad Munzavi whose scholarship on Islamic mysticism and ‘Ayn al-Qudat al-Hamadhani has been a major resource in writing this book. In Seattle, Farhat Ziadeh and Nicholas Heer were always available to give me feedback on my work. I have had the good fortune of being able to still rely on Hossein Ziai and Michael Fishbein for advice as when I was their graduate student. 





















The graduate seminars that I took with Samuel Weber had a formative influence on my intellectual orientation toward the philosophical treatment of death. I would like to acknowledge my gratitude to these mentors and to Carl Ernst with whom I held important discussions on ‘Ayn al-Qudat and especially his significance for the early Chishti scholars. Ellis Goldberg, Priti Ramamurthy, Michael Shapiro, Jennifer Dubrow, Jameel Ahmed, Michael Cooperson, Jere Bacharach, Terri De Young, and Anand Yang have been generous with their support. 
























I would like to acknowledge my gratitude to Elahe Mir-Djalali and the Roshan Cultural Heritage Institute for making it possible for me to organize an international conference on Indo-Persian Studies in January 2008 where I presented certain themes from this work. I am grateful to Felicia Hecker for her excellent editorial comments on the book manuscript. Trudy Kamperveen, Sebastian Giinther, Wadad Kadi, Kathy van Vliet, Renee Otto, Gera van Bedaf, and Joed Elich at Brill gave me important feedback on making this a better book. I am especially grateful to Trudy for her invaluable support.






















My research in India was sponsored by a fellowship from the American Institute of Indian Studies. I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the Institute and to especially thank Elise Auerbach, Purnima Mehta, and Mini Rajikumar for their help. My friends in India, Rasna, Rahul, and Roopa Bhushan, Mazhar Mehdi, Scott Kugle, Amit and Lakshmi Bararia, the Vidia Sager family, Bahawna Dharamcee, and the teaching staff at the Lumbini School, made me feel at home in their beautiful city of Hyderabad. I am grateful to Mehdi Khajeh Piri, Abd al-Hamid Ziai, and the distinguished staff at the Sayyid Noorullah Shushtari Center in Delhi. I would like to take this opportunity to thank Nargis Ahmadi Mugqaddam and Zahra Tahiri at Iran National Library, Rare Texts and Manuscripts Section. My gratitude goes to the librarians and the library staff who helped me at different locations in India. I would like especially to thank Rafath Rizwana, Tanveer Fatima, and Tirumala Rao who made it possible for me to make efficient use of my time at the Andhra Pradesh Oriental Manuscripts Library and Research Institute. I am grateful to Syed Shah Khusro Hussaini and his family for their hospitality during my stay in Gulbarga. Sahib Hussaini generously shared with me the resources that I needed in order to complete my work on his forefather, the great Chishti religious leader Khawaja Banda Nawaz Gisidaraz.

























Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to my family especially my brothers Mohammad Ali and Hossein, and my friends Zahra Afrokhteh, Monty Clouse, Takla Gardey, Karen Hansen, Fereshteh Diba, Cecile Kummerer, Frieda Afary, Farideh Godarzi, Craig BrookeWeiss, Latifeh Hagigi, Farideh Zarifi-Badi, Haideh Herbert, Jeff Erickson, and Douglas Jefferson. I am forever indebted to my dear William Weller. Writing this book has been a journey through time, languages, countries, and emotions. These destinations and dislocations have brought me closer to the city in my heart where I am always at home with Cole.

















INTRODUCTION


The present work is an analysis of the teachings of the twelfth-century Iranian mystic Abt al-Ma‘ali ‘Abdallah ibn Abi Bakr Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn al-Hasan ibn ‘Ali al-Miyanji, known as ‘Ayn al-Qudat al-Hamadhani. This famous Persian mystic was born in Hamadhan in A.H. 490 or 492 (A.D. 1096/1098) and was executed in the same town in 525/1131 on the charge of heresy.’ Hamadhan in northwest Iran, on the route connecting Khurasan and Baghdad, was a major cultural center in medieval Persia and the home of many scholars. It took pride in having been the home of the philosopher Avicenna (A.D. 980-1037) whom ‘Ayn al-Qudat held in high regard. Although no biographical records from the time of ‘Ayn al-Qudat survive, ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s extant works, as well as references to him by later authors, provide some information on his life and thought.” During his short life he composed books and treatises on a number of subjects ranging from mysticism to mathematics, natural sciences, grammar and semantics, Arabic literature, commentary on the Quran, and the nature of prophecy. Most of these works were written in Arabic, the scholarly language of Islam. Only his works on mysticism survived the Mongol invasion of the thirteenth century. Our knowledge of ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s learning and influence is limited to what we can deduce from his treatises and personal letters. The letters follow the question and answer (masa il wa ajwiba) literary tradition of medieval times; they present the questions posed to ‘Ayn al-Qudat by his associates and disciples. The letters provide insight into ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s immediate intellectual milieu and the nature of the issues and debates that concerned its members.



















‘Ayn al-Qudat came from a family of renowned shdfi7 jurists, and like his father and grandfather before him, he held lectures for his disciples and had a wide following in Hamadhan and among some of the Saljtiq court nobles.’ Nevertheless, he did not define himself in terms of any specific creed, nor did his views on faith adhere to the orthodox interpretations of Islam and the Qur'an. He wrote about all religions as different paths that led one to God.* Enjoying a solid scholarly background in Islamic religious sciences, he took issue with the perspective that interpreted faith through the teachings of the sharia. He explained that sharia promoted “habitude” (‘adat) and abiding by preconceived notions of the “unseen” (‘alam al-ghayb).° The complexity of thought and expression encountered in his writing poses a great challenge to the reader and requires careful analysis.


Scholarship on ‘Ayn al-Qudat is limited. The most famous medieval commentary on his Tamhidat (Introductions), written by Muhammad al-Husayni Abt al-Fath Sadr al-Din Wali Akbar Sadiq (720-825/13211422) known as Khawajah Banda Nawaz Gistidaraz, is an elaboration on selected passages of the original text—a common practice among medieval commentators. Gistidaraz was a venerated Chishti shaykh and an exceptional scholar whose views on ‘Ayn al-Qudat provide insight on how he was received among Indian Muslim mystics. Contemporary scholarship on ‘Ayn al-Qudat is limited but interesting. Most of these works were written after the 1930s, when Mohammed ben Abd el-Jalil published ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s defense treatise, Shakwa al-Gharib ‘an al-Awtan ila ‘Ulam@al-Buldan (The Complaint of a Stranger Exiled from Home to the Scholars of the Lands).° In 1960s, ‘Afif “Usayran and ‘Alinaqi Munzavi edited ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s corpus. These contributions have encouraged scholarship on ‘Ayn al-Qudat.


In the following chapters I shall elaborate themes mainly taken from the Tamhidat—generally considered ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s magnum opus—and I shall also utilize his other works. The Tamhidat describes an esoteric kind of “knowing,” which reflects “Ayn al-Qudat’s intimations on the unseen. The unseen (ghayb) is the mystery of God and His hidden realm. This realm is inaccessible to human reason and is thus unknowable. Moreover, attributes concealed within the ghayb are normally hidden from men. God reveals these attributes to men only as He wishes. The Quran is one such instance. In “Ayn al-Qudat the unseen consists of innumerable “worlds” that are experienced intermittently by the wayfarer. These realms become accessible to the wayfarer after he has experienced “mystical death” (mawt-i ma‘nawi). Mystical death is not synonymous with annihilation (fand)); it is the preliminary stage before fand’. It is the stage when the consciousness of the wayfarer is transcended but not annihilated and is in the consciousness that he perceives to be the consciousness of God. My research demonstrates how, in the work of ‘Ayn al-Qudat, knowledge of the unseen and death are interconnected. My methodology in approaching this theme is based on ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s treatment of death in his own writing with a focus on the Tamhidat. I consider death and gnosis through an intertextual reading of ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s texts. I use secondary references in order to create a context for his views on these subjects.


My discussion is organized in six chapters, as follows. In the first chapter, I provide an overview of ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s life and discuss works by him and works about him. Most of ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s early writings are lost. The authorship of some of the texts that are attributed to him is open to dispute, but scholars agree that ‘Ayn al-Qudat is the undisputed author of the Tamhidat (Introductions), Zubdat al-Haq@ iq (The Essence of Reality), Maktubat (Letters), and Shakwa al-Gharib ‘an al-Awtan ila ‘Ulama@ al-Buldadn (The Complaint of a Stranger Exiled from Home to the Scholars of the Lands). These are the main texts that I have used.


In the first chapter I also refer to “Ayn al-Qudat’s own death and discuss the primary sources that describe his imprisonment and execution. Very little is known about ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s personal life, and information on his death is limited. His defense treatise, Shakwa al-Gharib, which he composed during his imprisonment in Baghdad, is a valuable resource. This document is an apologia that contains information on the author’s life and works, some of which have been lost to us. It also tells us about the charge of heresy that was brought against him.


The second chapter concerns the discussions that ensued after ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s release from prison. His apologia aroused strong reactions among some of his students and associates who were not able to justify his appeals for freedom. They saw a contradiction between ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s earlier resolve on death and his later plea for freedom and return to his homeland Hamadhan. ‘Ayn al-Qudat responded to these objections by explaining that the exile and the captivity that the Shakwé al-Gharib refers to are a metaphoric intimation of the forlorn state of the soul. ‘Ayn al-Qudat turns to the familiar topoi of homeland and exile that appear in mystical literature in order to explain his physical imprisonment at the hands of his adversaries. His plight is reminiscent of the incarceration of other significant thinkers who used prison as an occasion to contemplate the existential predicament of man. Accordingly, this chapter provides a comparison between ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s defense, Plato’s Apology for Socrates, and the visionary recitals of Avicenna. These works were produced while their authors, who were incarcerated by state authorities, reflected on the imprisonment of the soul in the realm of matter.


The third chapter provides an analysis of death as a state of consciousness, as discussed by “Ayn al-Qudat. In the Tamhidat, ‘Ayn al-Qudat explains that he has experienced death while alive and refers to this condition as “mystical death.” In this context, ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s understanding of death is not in accord with Islam’s classical interpretation of death. The Tamhidat is an essential text in my research because it focuses on ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s treatment of mystical death and provides an epistemology of the lights that appear to the wayfarer after he has experienced this kind of death. As I will explain in chapter three, the lights that he sees after death represent God’s attributes and are the manifestation of the non-comparable light of God. Although ‘Ayn al-Qudat does not explain how he prepares for mystical death, he elaborates on the consciousness that he attains in this state and further describes this consciousness in relation to his visionary experiences.


‘Ayn al-Qudat’s discussions are significant because they depict death as both a personal as well as a cosmological event that is continuous. To invoke death and to rush forth greeting it, as is the case with ‘Ayn al-Qudat, is an entanglement with one’s own self. Death is an individual experience because it involves no one else but the person who is undergoing the experience. Moreover, death delimits one’s response to the inescapability of the single most inevitable occurrence in life. Death finds cosmological dimensions for those who, like ‘Ayn al-Qudat, believe in the existence of the ghayb and see death as the threshold to it. ‘Ayn al-Qudat considers death to be a path that takes a person to his or her humanity. In the Tamhidat he refers to an out-ofbody experience of death, which has brought him in contact with infinite realms of knowledge. ‘Ayn al-Qudat claims to have based his insights on personal experience of the realms past death. Accordingly, his writing is filled with discussions about this form of death and this kind of gnosis. In the Tamhidat, ‘Ayn al-Qudat sets forth a detailed analysis of the relationship between death, knowledge, and identity. Just as the soul experiences special worldly realms that are called “being in this world” (hudar), it experiences other special realms that are called “realms of the tomb” (ahwéal-i gir), and “realms of doomsday” (ahwal-i qiyamat). It is through death, in the latter sense, that the soul journeys on into these realms. Mystics who have experienced death while still living in the world of matter come to see realms of the tomb and of doomsday and go beyond these into unforeseen territories.


‘Ayn al-Qudat discusses death, the unseen, and consciousness by means of an eschatology that has its genesis in a structured dualism. The fourth chapter will develop this subject. It will examine “Ayn al-Qudat’s discussion of the spectrum of lights he saw while in the special realm of experience. These lights become discernible as the wayfarer enters the realm of death. They convey God’s attributes of “mercy” and “might” through the lights of Muhammad and Satan. These lights and their juxtaposition are among the mysteries that are unveiled to the wayfarer. ‘Ayn al-Qudat establishes this dualism by means of color metaphors and visions of good and evil. He explains that in the realm of God’s attributes there are two lights: sunlight and moonlight. Sunlight comes from the Prophet Muhammad and moonlight from Satan. Sunlight is the “shadow” of God, and moonlight reflects the light of the sun.’ The world of natural elements is a reflection of this dualistic “shadow play.” Placed against this background, man holds a distinct place: he contains both “light” and “shadow.” He is light since he is the depository of the light of God; and he is shadow because, as a human, he is enclosed in the frame of body and flesh. This discussion provides the key to ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s perspectives on good and evil; creation, generation, corruption, and death; humanity; and the nature of prophecy.

 















Chapter five evaluates the reception of ‘Ayn al-Qudat among his contemporaries and successors. ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s discussions on the attributes of God and the wayfarer’s position in relation to the lights convey his understanding of death as a process of self-identification. His views on eschatology and the unseen are referred to by mystics after him. Razbihan Baqli (a.p. 1128-1209) and Shihab al-Din Suhrawardi (a.p. 1154-1191), who lived close to ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s time, aspired to his views on this subject. Najm al-Din Razi (a.p. 1177-1256) also referred to ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s mystical doctrines. However, in general, mystics of the Arab and the Iranian worlds who came after ‘Ayn al-Qudat were wary of discussing him openly and extensively since the Saljiiq state had called him a heretic and ordered his death. Chapter five will evaluate the legacy of ‘Ayn al-Qudat with special attention to his reception among the early Indian Chishti scholars. Khawaja Banda Nawaz Gistdaraz and his contemporary mystic Mas ‘tid Bakk are particularly important in this discussion. Gistidaraz utilized “Ayn al-Qudat’s teachings in training his own disciples. In fact, he considered ‘Ayn al-Qudat to be so profound and complex that he deemed the novices among his students incapable of approaching his texts or his ideas. Therefore, Gistdaraz forbade his beginning students access to the Tamhidat and used this text only in teaching his advanced disciples. Gistidaraz’s detailed and elaborate commentary, Sharh-i Tamhidat, is intended for such readers among the Chishtis.


Chapter six concerns itself with sama’, listening to music in order to connect with the spiritual realms. As a spiritual practice, sama’ was the subject of controversial debates during the medieval-period. Those who vouched for samd' considered it an opportunity to approach God. Its opponents, however, emphasized the role of Satan in inciting fancies during samd that led the faithful astray. ‘Ayn al-Qudat and his teacher Ahmad Ghazzali were famous for both their adherence to sama and the literature that they produced on this subject. Ahmad Ghazzali’s treatise Bawdriq al-Ilmd’ fi al-Radd ‘Ala Man Yuharrimu al-Sama’ (The Lightning-Flashes of Indication Concerning the Refutation of Those Who Declare Audition Forbidden in General) was received as a classical manifesto in defense of sama.’ The early Chishtis followed the discussions of these mystics in giving shape to their understanding of sama’.
















In conclusion, ‘Ayn al-Qudat argues that the visionary apperception of the unseen calls into question the categorical confidence we place in the rational processes of cognition, reason, and the individual’s articulation of the self in relation to faith. The incommensurability of the realities that the mystic observes through death call attention to the individuality of the mystic/wayfarer: namely, the “position” of the wayfarer as he travels the mystical path and his manner of “walking” the path. This subject can be approached in different relationships and in the context of the wayfarer’s response to the mysteries that are unveiled to him. These include his perception of the lights that he sees, as well as his understanding and response to the manifestation of God’s attributes.


The present volume sets forth ‘Ayn al-Qudat’s discussion on these subjects through his understanding of mystical death and _ its accompanying mode of perception. Death takes the wayfarer away from his position of certitude in regard to ontological truths to a realm of consciousness where he experiences mysteries of the unseen as new and ever-extending processes. The confluence of his consciousness and these spectacles of protean truths signifies the mutability of the position of the wayfarer apropos himself in the capacity of a “knowing,” “self-sufficient” subject. ‘Ayn al-Qudat explains his mystical insights in terms of lights whose function, as he declares in the beginning of the Tamhidat, is to assert the existence of a hidden truth. He explains that the wayfarer understands the “reality” past “appearance” as he ventures through the gate of mysteries and goes beyond what lies therein: “If you set out, you arrive, and you see.” But the extensions of this reality are beyond comprehension because they are the reflection of the light of God, which constitutes all of creation and is infinitely unfolding. And yet, to set one’s self in motion, to go, to arrive, and to see, is indeed a mystery contingent upon a “going” that is a relentless “seeing” and “arriving.” He defines these realities as manifestations of the light of God and describes “seeing” as a mode of understanding the unseen (ghayb). The wayfarer who experiences these realities, like the prophets, is among God’s select human beings.
































Link















Press Here










عربي باي