Download PDF | ( Edinburgh Studies In Classical Islamic History And Culture) Yaacov Lev, The Administration Of Justice In Medieval Egypt From The 7th To The 12th Century Edinburgh University Press ( 2020)
310 Pages
Acknowledgements
I owe a great debt of gratitude to Petra M. Sijpesteijn and the Leiden Institute for Area Studies for their warm hospitality during my sabbatical at Leiden University in 2012-13. I became aware of the significance of papyrology, and Arabic papyrology in particular, through many conversations with Petra and Khaled Younes and Jelle Bruning, then Ph.D. students at the research project “The Formation of Islam: The View from Below’. The year in Leiden was formative for my understanding of how early Muslim history should be approached and studied. I owe an equally great debt of gratitude to Mathieu Tillier of the Sorbonne University, who read the first draft of the Introduction and Chapters 1-3 and offered many valuable corrections and thoughtful remarks. My colleagues Miriam Frenkel and Oded Zinger of the Hebrew University generously shared with me their knowledge of Jewish history and Geniza studies, and offered many useful comments on Chapter 7.
It was a great pleasure, and a great intellectual experience, to participate in and contribute to the ‘Histoire et archéologie de l’Islam et de la Méditerranée médiévale’ seminar at the Sorbonne University in October-December 2014. I am grateful to Anne-Marie Eddé, Annliese Nef and Sylvie Denoix for their welcome in Paris, and to Christophe Picard and David Bramoullé for their hospitality in Toulouse during a short visit to Le Miral University.
The peer-review system has its imperfections, but I had the privilege of benefiting from corrections, suggestions and bibliographical references to sources and literature made by two anonymous readers on behalf of Edinburgh University Press.
During the course of my research I received generous assistance from numerous libraries and librarians. I am much obliged to Marlis J. Saleh, who kindly introduced me to the vast resources of the Joseph Regenstein Library, University of Chicago in the summer of 2016. Geula Elimelekh, who vastly expanded the Arabic collection at the Bar Ilan University Library, helped me in procuring sources and literature, while Dina Baum’s expertise with electronic resources proved invaluable. My thanks to all of them.
Introduction: Issues and Methodology
t the heart of the book lies the largely ignored question of to what extent Muslim law (sharia) was applied in medieval Islamic states and whether its precepts indeed governed the life of individuals and the conduct of society. This book, however, is not about the formation of Islamic law, but rather about judicial institutions which preceded and paralleled the formation of the law and remained in place unaffected by that formation. The book is also about the political-administrative history that shaped the way justice was administrated, and what the spheres of competence were of the various bodies that made up the system.
Four judicial institutions were involved in the administration of justice in medieval Islam: the cadi, the chief of police (shurta/sahib al-shurta), the market inspector (hisba/muhbtasib) and the ruler (the mazalim institution). There are ample sources and a considerable body of literature on the way the cadi operated and how justice was dispensed by the ruler. To what extent, however, the mazdlim court — not to say criminal justice dispensed by the chief of the police — adhered to and was congruent with the shari‘a remains little-discussed. What is known about the chiefs of police in early Islam and the Fatimid period casts doubt as to whether sari‘ law was applied in the cases adjudicated by them, and how the police gained a monopoly on the administration of criminal justice is another obscure question. The same set of questions is applicable to the isha law and the post of market inspector; both became Islamised and perceived as the embodiment of the Koranic dictum of ‘commanding right and forbidding wrong’. Early hisba manuals, however, are texts with no religious connotations, and the core of the hisba regulations remained beyond the pale of the sharia.
Modern literature on medieval Islam perceives the shari‘a as an embodiment of Islam as a system of beliefs and civilisation. Joseph Schacht, for example, has stated:
Islamic law is the epitome of the Islamic spirit, the most typical manifestation of the Islamic way of life, the kernel of Islam itself. For the majority of the Muslims, the law has always been and still is of
much greater practical importance than the dogma.!
I would argue that medieval realities were complex, and that within the system of the administration of justice shari‘a played a well-defined but narrow place since full congruence between the two obtained only at the cadi’s court. Medieval people and authors were well aware of the situation, which is implicitly reflected in their writings. As a means of realising that my observation is a fair and balanced reflection of medieval realities, one can begin with the famous Abkam al-Sultaniyya by Mawardi (974-1058). The topic of the ‘administration of justice’ is not dealt with as such by Mawardi, but the various components of the system are extensively discussed in several chapters. Mawardi’s account of the cadi institution is long and complex, and the discussion begins with the question of who is qualified for the appointment: that is, a mature free-born Muslim male who is in full control of his faculties and endowed with proper moral qualities (‘adala) and knowledge of the law.’ According to Mawardi, a cadi’s jurisdiction, or fields of competence (ab kam), involves ten cases, which include resolution of disputes (mundza at), the securing of rights for those who legally possess them (istifa’ al-huqug), establishing guardianship (wildya), conducting marriages and divorces, disposing of legacies, supervision of pious endowments, and implementation of the punishments laid down by God (hada, pl. hudid). Under the heading of the cadi’s abkdm Mawardi also discusses procedural aspects of how the cadi’s court is run and the moral principles that must guide his conduct. The
cadi has the right to examine the probity of the court’s witnesses and trustees and to appoint and dismiss them. He is also reminded that he must treat the powerful and weak equally, and the same applies to the treatment of a noble descendant of the Prophet’s family (sharif) and an ordinary respected commoner (mashrif)).
Other institutions that were involved in the administration of justice, such as hisba and mazdlim, are also discussed. Mawardi’s discussion of the hisba reflects its full Islamisation under the motto of commanding right and forbidding wrong. From Mawardi’s account one can argue that the /isba institution represented a fusion of the Islamic principles of commanding right and forbidding wrong, which were drafted onto the existing laws of the market. Mawardi enumerates nine distinctions between the institutional role of the person in charge of the hisha (wali al-hisba) in implementing ‘commanding right and forbidding wrong’ and an individual involved in doing this. From the point of view of the current discussion, the most significant aspect of Mawardi’s account of the hisba is the attempt to explain the differences between the hisba and the cadi. Mawardi states that the hisba is an institution placed between the jurisdiction of the cadi and mazalim. He also states that in two respects the hisba is analogous to the cadi, but also inferior in two respects and superior in two other respects. Perhaps Mawardi’s most important observation concerns the different approach of the muhtasib and cadi towards stemming the spread of morally reprehensible practices (munkarat). He states: ‘Hisba involves [the striking of] fear and the muhtasib’s use of fear and harsh conduct [salata and ghilza\ should not be considered as oppression [jawr] and violation of rights [kharq], while cadi’s jurisdiction is about implementation of justice [by means of] leniency and reverence.‘ Following these illuminating remarks, the subsequent sections of Mawardi’s discussion are dedicated to the “commanding right and forbidding wrong’ aspect of the /isba institution. If an anachronistic approach can be pardoned here, it can be argued that Mawardi perceives the mubhtasib as belonging to the executive branch of the government and as an official exercising of legitimate coercive powers.
From the point of view of my argument, the most significant aspect of Mawardi’s discussion of the hisba has been noted by Emile Tyan, and the key sentence in his translation is as follows: ‘la jurisprudence /ato sensu du muhbtasib est une jurisprudence coutumiére et non une jurisprudence légale.”> Tyan’s sentence is taken from the section of Mawardi’s text which offers a brief description of the practical matters which should concern the muhtasib. He also offers a general observation, saying that the mubtasib is concerned with the distinction between what is harmful and what is not. His decision-making process is described as involving independent reasoning (ijtihad) based on customary law. Mawardi also asserts that there is a difference between independent reasoning based on customary and shari‘ law, and vaguely implies that the muhtasib is prevented from exercising ijtihad within the framework of the shari‘a.°
The Islamisation of the isha under the motto ‘commanding right and forbidding wrong’ did not alter its substance as ‘wrfi law (jurisprudence coutumieére) outside the pale of the shari‘a (jurisprudence /égale). Although not explicitly stated, the recognition of the tension between “urfi and shar ‘i elements in the way the hisba functioned also characterises Janos Jany’s discussion of the institution.”
Mawardi’s list of the qualities required of a person appointed mazdalim involves an almost impossible combination of projecting power and religious scrupulousness. The nominee should be ‘azim al-hayba (most awe-inspiring) and kathir al-wara‘ (most religiously strict, or pious). Mawardi provides an extensive account of how the mazdlim sessions should be conducted and specifies ten spheres of the mazdlim’s jurisdiction, which also includes supervision of pious endowments. This statement can be perceived as an encroachment on the cadi’s domain, but actually it reflects the superior nature of the mazdlim institution. Unhesitatingly, Mawardi states that the person in charge of the mazdlim (wali al-mazdlim) is more awe-inspiring, has a stronger hand and is more powerful than the cadi. The mazdlim institution is perceived as an institution superior to that of the cadi and the hisba. Mawardi
states:
it is permitted to a person in charge of the mazdlim to examine the affairs of both the cadi and the market inspector while it is not permitted to the cadi to examine the affairs of the wali al-mazdalim but it is permitted to him to examine the affairs of the market supervisor. The market inspector is neither allowed to examine the affairs of the cadi nor those of the wali al-mazalim.?
Tyan’s discussion of the mazdlim institution is very extensive and goes beyond Mawardi’s text. It combines topical and chronological approaches and gives attention to both the Muslim East and West. Jany’s discussion is focused more on Mawardi’s text, and he lists the ten areas of competence ascribed to the mazdlim institution. Both perceive the procedural aspects of the mazalim as marking the main difference between it and the cadi’s court." Reading the sources and the literature, we draw the unavoidable conclusion that the mazdlim institution was mostly, if not completely, outside the pale of the Islamic law.
The police are not mentioned as an institution involved in the administration of justice, but a long chapter is devoted to the dispensing of criminal justice (abkam al-jara’im). Mawardi’s discussion commences with the unequivocal statement that ‘crimes are things forbidden by the shari‘a which God has restrained by badd and ta‘zir [discretionary punishments]’. The sections that immediately follow this statement, however, envisage the amir (the person who wields power [amr]), not the cadi, as the state official who renders criminal justice. Subsequently, the chapter specifies ten situations in which he has a role to play.'!
The role of the cadi in the implementation of the hudid is alluded to but not detailed. The different perspectives of the umara’ (pl. form of amir) and the cadis when examining the guilt or innocence of the accused are emphasized, and Mawardi states that the wmard’ are more concerned with the political (siydsa) aspects of the case while the cadis are more concerned with the legal norms (abkam). Once guilt was established there was, however, no difference between the wmara’ and the cadis in the implementation of God’s laid-down punishments.
Mawardi’s description of the administration of justice as a hierarchical system created by the state which involved the mazdlim, cadi, hisba and abkam al-jara’im is a reflection of medieval realities with which a student of medieval Islamic history and society is quite familiar. In order to see how limited the role of the cadi was within this system one has to read Mawardi’s chapter dealing with the nigaba institution (the headship of the “Alid family) which investigated, supervised and took care of people who claimed the Prophet’s lineage.'* The institution involved two officials (naqib, pl. nuqaba): one was responsible for people claiming lineage through ‘Ali (the Prophet’s son-in-law) and one for those claiming lineage through “Abbas (the Prophet’s uncle). The rationale behind the institution’s existence was to prevent people of lower status, having no lineage to the Prophet, from exercising authority over the Prophet’s descendants. The institution’s spheres of responsibility involved nigaba al-khassa and nigaba al-‘amma. The nagib entrusted with the niqaba al-khassa was responsible for maintaining the purity of the lineage of people claiming to be the Prophet’s descendants and for rendering them various services. The nzagib entrusted with nigaba al- ‘amma had judicial authority over the people claiming both lines of descent, but his appointment did not necessarily curtail the involvement of the cadi in their judicial affairs.’
The value of Mawardi’s discussion of the various state institutions that played a role in the administration of justice goes beyond the light it sheds on the role of the cadi within the system. The text provides insights into two issues of which we always must be aware when medieval legal and judicial
realities are discussed: frequently, the spheres of administrative and judicial responsibilities were blurred (see the niqaba institution) and the system had ingrained biases and preferences. Although the notion of equity before the law is firmly stated in medieval Arabic texts dealing with the cadi institution, the system (in the modern perception) was biased against women and exhibited strong class/social preferences. The cadi, like any other official involved in the administration of justice, operated within these parameters and the system must be evaluated on its strengths and weaknesses, not by modern
notions of justice. Setting the Stage: The Contemporary Historiography of Early Islam
The aim of the following three sections is to provide a unifying framework for the book and to present topics which are directly relevant to the discussion of the administration of justice. A diachronic approach has been adopted as the methodology for discussing the question of to what extent Muslim law was applied in medieval Islamic states and societies. The inquiry is also heavily influenced and informed by the progress that has been made in recent decades in the study of early Islam.
The contemporary historiography of early Islam is dominated by two paradigms: ‘From /ahiliyya to Islam’, and ‘From Late Antiquity to Early Islam’. These are complementary approaches that emphasise dynamic processes of transition and change while depicting the emerging Muslim civilisation as firmly rooted in both its Arab pre-Islamic past and the world of Late Antiquity. Medieval Muslim discourse on the formation of Islam is structured more along the lines of the “From /ahiliyya to Islam’ paradigm, and emphasises a break with the Arab pagan past (jahiliyya) and a transition to monotheism (tawhid).'* This break supposedly involved a total reorientation of beliefs and social practices and included, for example, changing female or male first names. When we turn to literature, we find that discussion about the acceptance of Islam at the time of the Prophet is surprisingly sparse and hampered by the late date of the sources and the question as to what extent they retain the early sense of the phenomenon.” Islamic discourse also emphasises the formation of a separate and unique Muslim identity that differed from those of Christianity and Judaism. The various themes of this internal discourse are illustrated by Ibn Habib’s account of the reforms of the Umayyad caliph ‘Abd al-Malik (685-705), which involved the replacement of pre-Islamic weights by Islamic ones and the decision to mint coins bearing exclusively Koranic inscriptions which, Ibn Habib (d. 852) asserts, was a unique Islamic practice.'° Glimpses and insights into how a separate Islamic identity (vis-a-vis Christianity) was formed are also provided by nonMuslim sources, which emphasise the killing of pigs in 693-4 in Syria and the destruction of icons in 723—4.'”
Recently, the study of early Islam has been more and more influenced by a third paradigm, which emphasises processes taking place from below as playing a decisive role in shaping of Islam as a religion and socio-political entity. This approach is encapsulated by the heading of the Leiden University research project, “Ihe Formation of Islam: The View from Below’, and is characterised by reliance on documentary sources, the papyri, relegating literary sources to second place.'* Like any other historiographical method it has its problems, and Frank E. Peters, for example, alludes to some of these in stating ‘the view from below is random, scattered and occasional’ and
poses the question of whether it is typical or eccentric.!? Although papyri have been found in a number of places in the Middle East, the greatest and most significant finds come from several sites in Upper Egypt and the Fayyam. The problems involved in interpreting papyri in general, and in the Egyptian context in particular, have been discussed by Petra M. Sijpesteijn, who points out that most of the Egyptian population lived in the Delta, and the question of whether the realities of Upper Egypt also apply to the Delta is largely unanswered.”° As Marie Legendre’s work clearly bears out, the question of how to interpret papyrological evidence pertaining to a certain topic or region in the absence of parallel documentation is always relevant whether in the context of broad study or a case study.”’ Furthermore, as has been noted by Maged S. A. Mikhail, papyri mostly reflect local daily life and the policies of the provincial government (mostly taxation), while policies at the state level largely fall outside the scope of these documents.** The same can be said about other institutions which are scarcely referred to in the papyrological record. Sijpesteijn has noted, for example, that “Ihe Muslim army has left us a surprisingly meagre paper trail, at least in the papyri that have come to light so far’. The contradiction between the central role of the army and military affairs in political and social life, which is amply attested in the literary sources, and the documentary record is explained by the lack of correlation between the location of Muslim armies in Egypt and the places where papyri were discovered.”?
The inverse correlation between the papyrological record and certain state institutions also applies to the judiciary and has a direct bearing on the present discussion. Mathieu Tillier, Lucian Reinfandt and Jelle Bruning have discussed the administration of justice in Egypt’s provinces and have pointed out that state officials at the local level and the governor in Fustat played a significant role in the provincial system. When approaching the matter in the context of the paradigm of continuity and rupture — or, to put it differently, ‘from Late Antiquity to Early Islam’ — one must note Bruning’s observation that from the 710s onward the governor of Egypt dealt with legal disputes
among the country’s non-Muslim population in the provinces. According to Bruning, the first indisputable reference (in documentary sources) to a provincial cadi dates from 811.% Significant changes took place along the eighth century, and Tillier has noted:
Ce n’est qu’au second Age Abbasside, alors que Egypte s’engageait dans la voie de l'autonomie provinciale, que le modéle classique de la judicature
cadiale finit par s’*imposer en Haute-Egypte.”° Meanwhile Reinfandt has pointed out:
Documentary sources never mention gédi-s earlier than the middle of the 2nd/8th century and confirm that under Umayyad rule judicial tasks and practical legal matters were dealt with by state authorities and officials of the public executive, such as provincial governors, heads of districts, and
village headmen.”®
The remarks made by them are presented in the context of a study of provincial judicial authorities in Umayyad Egypt and apply to this context only. The situation in Fustat was different, and the difference between what was happening in the capital and the provinces is not only a reflection of the inverse correlation between institutional presence and papyri finds, but also reflects Arab-Muslim demography and patterns of settlement in Egypt. In other words, the cadi was a Muslim institution that served the Muslim population mainly concentrated in Fustat. Ninth- to tenth-century Arab-Muslim historiography was written in Fustat and reflects its realities; however, as the Islamisation process progressed the cadi institution also spread to the provinces. Different types of sources reflect different segments of population and different types of interaction between these populations and the state and its institutions. The cadi, as a marker of sizeable Muslim populations in provincial towns, is, for example, clearly attested in Ibn Hawgal’s tenth-century description of the Delta. This argument tallies with that of Tillier: the study of the role of the cadi as a dispenser of justice must be undertaken in the con-
text of the Islamisation of Egypt. ’’ I am fully aware that correlation between the two issues is difficult, if not impossible. The study of Fustat and other garrison towns is easier because of the settlement of Arab-Muslim population there and the fact that the cadi institution evolved there. It reached Egypt’s provincial towns when the spread of Arab-Muslim population accelerated and Islamisation advanced. The office of the cadi was a Muslim urban institution, and one cannot expect to find it in small and insignificant settlements with no, or a small, Muslim population.
When the administration of justice is discussed in a wider context, the topic transcends the three paradigmatic approaches outlined above and also touches upon two other interwoven issues: the formation of Islamic identity and the Islamic state. Any discussion about the existence of the early Islamic state seems somewhat artificial, especially in view of the vast Muslim military and naval activity that took place during 630-750, which was sustained through state political authority and institutions that marshalled the necessary resources. Nonetheless, the notion that there was an Umayyad state that was characterised by institutions and a legitimising ideology has been convincingly demonstrated in Fred M. Donner’s 1986 seminal study, in which he relied on non-literary sources in support of the argument. Another approach has been suggested by Legendre, who perceives the formation of the Islamic state as an interplay between the conquerors and the conquered.”*
Whatever the methodological problems involved with the study of the papyri, the contribution of papyri and epigraphy to the study of early Islam is immense. When the methodology of relying on non-literary sources is adopted, the epigraphic evidence can be perceived as showing the emergence of an Islamic identity during “Abd al-Malik’s rule. For example, a funerary stela from Aswan in Upper Egypt dated to 652 implores God to forgive the deceased, reflecting typical monotheistic piety which lacks any particular Islamic character. Forty years after the 652 stela was engraved, another funerary stela from the same place is couched in typical Islamic terminology which
invokes God’s mercy on the Prophet Muhammad His messenger and states that there is no God but the One God, who has no associates.”” Allusions to Islamic identity pre-date the 652 Aswan stela and include references to the Hijri calendar and historical events associated with the rise of Islam. The death of the caliph “Umar ibn al-Khattab (‘Umar I 634-44), referred to simply by his name with no titles, is recorded in a grafhito/commemorative inscription on the Syrian pilgrimage road south of Medina. The inscription, which refers to the year 24/644—5, indicates the use and diffusion of the Hijri calendar and is in line with similar off-hand references made in other early inscriptions.*” Recent years have seen great progress in the study of grafhti, and more references to early caliphs and political events such as the killing of the caliph “Uthman (644-58) have come to light. One of the most interesting allusions is to an Umayyad prince referred to as wali ‘ahd al-muslimin wa-l-muslimat (heir apparent of Muslim men and women), which, eventually, was simplified to wali ‘ahd al-muslimin (heir apparent of Muslims).*! Equally fascinating is the Greek inscription commemorating the rebuilding of the hot baths of Hammat Gader, on the Golan Heights, for the use of the sick (5 December 662). It begins with the name of Mu ‘awiya, referred to as the Commander of the Faithful, mentions the name of the person responsible for the project and alludes to both the local dating system and the Hijri one.»
When the scope of the investigation is expanded to also include documentary evidence, the introduction of the Hijri calendar is alluded to in bilingual Greek—Arabic papyri of a fiscal nature which refer to the Egyptian calendar with a cycle of fifteen indiction years and the Muslim calendar. The first known papyrus of this kind, using both the calendar of the indiction cycle and the Muslim dating system (Jumada II 22), is from 25 April 643.* The use of Hijri dating can be interpreted as indicating the existence of a basic Islamic identity that is concurrent with the caliphs of Medina (the Rashidin, 632-60) and the beginning of Mu‘awiya’s rule. The notion that a strong state had already existed during the rule of Mu ‘awiya has recently been put forward by Clive Foss, who considers the caliph to be ‘the most important secular ruler of the entire 7th century’, while Robert Hoyland discerns a gradual institutional and ideological evolution throughout the Umayyad period.™
Many aspects of Umayyad state activity, such as public building and road improvements, are attested in inscriptions and papyri. The Umayyads also sponsored the building of mosques in Damascus, Jerusalem and the holy cities of Arabia, while the development of a legitimising ideology is clearly borne out by coinage and literary sources.*’ On the political level, the Umayyad state sponsored theological dogmas, fought rebels of diverse political and religious backgrounds, and persecuted and executed those branded as heretics.*°
The contribution of literary sources to the debate about the formation of an Islamic identity must not be overlooked, since these sources indicate that the process was also inspired from above, with the governors playing an important role in the development of Islamic religious rituals. In 673 in Fustat, for instance, the governor Maslama ibn Mukhallad ordered that the call to prayer should be made simultaneously in all the city’s mosques, while in 690-1 another governor was the first to introduce the supplication prayers on 9 Dhiai |-Hijja, to coincide with the wuqif performed in ‘Arafa during the pilgrimage.*’ In addition, the governors of Egypt were responsible for the building and rebuilding of the congregational Ancient Mosque in Fustat, also known as the mosque of ‘Amr ibn al-‘As. In these works politics and religion intervened, as the architectural shaping of a common sacred public space conveyed political authority. In 664—5, for example, Maslama ibn Mukhallad enlarged the Ancient Mosque and pulled down sections built by ‘Amr ibn al-‘As in 656—7 (for ‘Amr’s complex relations with the Umayyads see the next section). He also added minarets to other mosques. In 696-7, the entire mosque was razed and rebuilt on the orders of ‘Abd al-‘Aziz, the governor of Egypt and the son of the caliph Marwan. Nonetheless, even such highranking patronage did not ensure the future of the new edifice. In 710-11, the governor Qurra ibn Sharik, acting on the instructions of the caliph, pulled down the mosque built by the governor “Abd al-‘Aziz in 696-7. In this case, the rebuilding of the mosque reflected an intra-Umayyad power struggle. In 705-6, the caliph “Abd al-Malik appointed his son “Abd Allah governor of Egypt and ordered him to dismiss the people appointed by his uncle ‘Abd al-‘Aziz. It seems that the ultimate undoing of ‘Abd al-‘Aziz’s policies was the destruction of the mosque he had built.
The rulers’ interest in mosques was not limited to the congregational mosque in Fustat, and in 749-50 an order was issued to install pulpits in provincial mosques. ** This deed, like the appearance of the institution of cadi in the provincial context, might be considered as indicating the spread of Muslim population and Islamisation. In the broader Islamic context, what happened with the Ancient Mosque in Fustat happened with the Kaaba sanctuary, which was pulled down and rebuilt by the anti-Umayyad rebel Ibn Zubayr and, following the Umayyad suppression of the rebellion, recon-
structed in its original form.*” While the state was responsible for the shap-ing of the architectural form of mosques, it also took responsibility for the performance of the hajj. An Arabic papyrus dated to 705-17 indicates that the caliph called people to perform the /ajj and state dignitaries echoed the call, while non-Muslim literary sources date the state patronage of the hajj to Mu ‘awiya.”
In the literary sources Mu ‘awiya is described as playing a crucial role in the shaping of religious rites, court etiquette and governing institutions. The geographer and historian Yaqubi (fl. second half of the ninth century), for example, provides a long list of things that Mu ‘awiya did first, referring to the installation of pulpits and magstras (the area in a mosque near the prayer niche [mibrab}, preserved for the ruler) in mosques and, in the court context, the use of the throne and the establishment of a bodyguard (haras). Mu‘awiya was also the first to employ Christian clerks in the administration and to set up the office of the seal.*! When approached from the perspective of state formation and the crystallisation of Islamic identity, the contribution made by judicial institutions, especially the cadi, to the shaping of medieval Islamic civilisation and its modes of life is clearly discernible. The institutionalisation of the administration of justice was a complex process that took place both top down and bottom up. The cadi’s pivotal role within this system and in social life in general was achieved through the actions of individual cadis, some of whom introduced new judicial procedures while others assumed extra-judicial responsibilities and extended the scope of the cadi’s jurisdiction (see Chapter 1).
The Outlines of Egypt’s Political History (642-1171)
While the hallmarks of Egypt’s political history from the Arab conquest up until the rise to power of Saladin (642-1171) are well-known and need little elaboration, the aim of this section is to introduce events, people, issues and terms that will be constantly referred to in the subsequent chapters, and to set the topic in its broader contextual and conceptual framework.
The political life of the nascent Muslim community in Medina was
marked by an intense personal and ideological clash between the pre-Islamic Arab past and its ethos and the changes associated with the rise of Islam and its new religious belief system. These conflicts are illustrated by the personal and political vicissitudes of ‘Amr ibn al-‘As, the conqueror of Egypt, whose career has been discussed by Nabia Abbott, Michael Lecker and Andrew Marsham. Ibn Ishaq (d. 767) depicts ‘Amr ibn al-‘As’s career in Islam as having been dominated by a factor beyond his control: his mother’s humble status as a captive woman who claimed that ‘As ibn Wail was his father. Another factor to be considered was the late conversion of members of “Amr ibn al-‘As’s family to Islam (in 628 or 629). According to Ibn Ishaq, both blemishes on the family line were thrown at ‘Amr ibn al-‘As’ when the succession of ‘Umar I was discussed at his deathbed in Medina.” Our perception of this stage of Muslim history should not be unduly influenced by Ibn Ishaq’s views that humble origins and a late conversion to Islam hindered the careers of people during the transition period from paganism to Islam. This phase of early Islamic history was dynamic, deeds and personal achievements mattered, and people rose through the ranks, especially since late converts among the Quraysh had not been ostracised by the Prophet. ‘Amr ibn al-‘As, for example, served as governor and military commander during the life of the Prophet and participated in the conquests both of Palestine and, later, Egypt. The conquest of Egypt has recently been re-examined by Phil Booth, who argues that it involved two Muslim armies, moving in different directions under the command of ‘Amr, who served as governor of the country under ‘Umar I and during the early years of “‘Uthman’s rule (644-56). It seems, however, that in 648—9 he was dismissed and even banned from Medina.* ‘Amr ibn al-‘As’s re-emergence onto the political scene and his return as governor of Egypt in 658—9 was the result of what has been described by Abbott as a deal made between him, his sons “Abd Allah and Muhammad and Wardan, the family’s protégé and confidant, and Mu ‘awiya in which military and political support was traded for the governorship and revenues of Egypt. How the co-operation between Mu‘awiya and ‘Amr ibn al-‘As evolved after the killing of ‘Uthman (June 655) has been elucidated by Marsham. ‘Amr ibn al-‘As served Mu ‘awiya during the arbitration following the Battle of Siffin (in early July 657) and made a formal pact with him in 658-9. The text of the pact, as reproduced by Ibn Sa‘d (d. 845), is considered to be genuine (to the extent that these texts can be perceived as such), and it promises the governorship of Egypt to ‘Amr ibn al-‘As upon the conquest of the province from the hands of Mu‘awiya’s opponents.“ Indeed, after heavy fighting, ‘Amr ibn al-‘As conquered Egypt with troops drafted in Syria and held the governorship of Egypt. Muhammad ibn Yusif al-Kindi (hereafter referred to as Kindi, 897-961) writes that Egypt became ‘Amr ibn al-‘As’s personal source of income (tu ‘ma) and that he kept the revenues for himself after paying the troops and covering other expenses involved with ruling the country. ‘Amr ibn al-‘As governed Egypt until his death in 663-4 and was briefly succeeded by his son ‘Abd Allah, whom Mu ‘awiya immediately dismissed and replaced with his brother “Utba ibn Abi Sufyan, a move that marked the return of Egypt from private patrimonial rule to the direct control of the ruling family and, perhaps, one should say, state control.
The political culture and social fabric of the Umayyad and early Abbasid period were marked by familial ties, bonds of personal loyalty and patronage. Brothers, for instance, shared appointments or, more accurately, a person who received an appointment took advantage of the opportunity to appoint a brother to a key post. The regime regarded this conduct as normative since both familial and forged bonds constituted the basic building blocks of society and social life. On the political level bonds of personal loyalty and patronage involving provincial elites, administrators and rulers were maintained and regularly reinforced through the wafd (delegation) institution. The most notable example of a wafd is perhaps the one performed by ‘Utba ibn Abi Sufyan, who, immediately after his arrival in Egypt, returned to Damascus leading a delegation of local notables (ashraf ahl Misr).
His knowledge of the local scene in Fustat was, however, inadequate since the nomination of his deputy was much resented. Upon his return to Egypt, he made a public appearance at a mosque and reportedly reminded the people that the oath of allegiance they swore to the caliph involved obedience, while what they could expect in return was justice.“ To what extent Kindi’s text contains echoes of political concepts prevalent during the 660s is an open question, but, if we take a long-term view of medieval Islamic political scene, justice as an obligation of the rulers towards their subjects became a common trope.”
‘The very personal character of the wafd in establishing, or re-enforcing, bonds of loyalty between the reigning caliph, the governor and provincial notables is exemplified by the events of 723-4. In 720-1, Bishr ibn Safwan, who served as governor of Egypt, was also nominated as governor of Ifriqiya (modern Tunisia), and when he took his new post he left his brother as deputy on his behalf in Egypt. In 105/723—4 Bishr returned to Egypt leading a wafd from Ifriqiya to Damascus, but when the news about the death of the caliph reached him he returned to Ifrigiya.
The wafd institution also reflected an attempt to project an image of good government and just rule. A shipment of tax money sent to Damascus from the garrison towns was accompanied by a delegation of trustworthy people chosen from among the inhabitants and the military who had to swear that the money had been justly collected and constituted a surplus left after the troops and their families had been paid.** The wafd institution also served the caliph al-Mansur (754-75) to consolidate his rule, and the newly appointed governor of Egypt sent a delegation to deliver the oath of allegiance of the Arab population of Egypt (ah/ Misr) to the caliph. One can assume that the wafd institution became irrelevant during the political breakdown of the Abbasid caliphate, but, in 799 and again in 801, Egypt’s governor Layth ibn Fadl went twice to Baghdad to deliver money and gifts, leaving his brother as deputy in Egypt.”
At the provincial level, the state military payroll, or the diwdn system, was the most important institution. It had a twofold impact on the Arab population of Egypt, making the recipients of the diwan’s payments a highly privileged group while intensifying intra-Arab rivalries over the inclusion in the system. The creation of the diwdn system is attributed to ‘Umar I and the registration was done according to tribal affiliation (zasab), but the payments were determined according to seniority in Islam, the sabiga principle. Throughout its long history, however, the seniority principle was much eroded and the local and central authorities used the system to maintain Arab and non-Arab military groups. People affiliated with Arab tribes (mawaili, clients) were also added to the state payroll and, occasionally, received the highest payments. Mawaili also served as a fighting force and it is reasonable to assume that they were registered on the military payroll under the names of their Arab patrons.”
In Egypt, the first payroll was drawn up shortly after the conquest of the country and, up until 721, it was redrawn four times. The people on the payroll received payments (‘atd) and allocations of wheat (arzaq), which made them largely independent of the wheat market. It seems that the annual wheat allocation per family was twelve irddabs, which was considered sufficient for the yearly consumption of a middle-class family.” Our understanding of the system and how it functioned is marred by many difficulties. The main question is whether the system supported the Arab and mawéali population of a province or the local military only. Other problems concern the shifts in policy on two crucial questions: whether families continue to receive payments for deceased beneficiaries and whether new-born babies and young children were entitled to payments from the diwan.”°
The tribal and social composition of the army in Egypt saw many changes during the Rashidiin, Umayyad and Abbasid periods and the diwan system was modified accordingly. These changes involved the arrival of new Arab troops in Egypt, the recruitment of non-Arab troops in Egypt and, during the Abbasid period, the arrival of non-Arab caliphal troops. Although the core of the army that conquered Egypt was made up of Arab troops, other groups of diverse ethnic and geographical origin also participated in the campaign and settled in Fustat.* Moreover, because of the political struggles during early Islam and the Umayyad period, new Arab armies came to Egypt and settled in the country.
This certainly was the case with the Syrian Arab troops with whom ‘Amr ibn al-‘As reconquered Egypt for Mu‘awiya. According to Ibn ‘Abd al-Hakam (772-829), during Mu’awiya’s reign there were 40,000 names on the diwan’s payroll and 4,000 people received the highest remuneration. The lists of the diwdan were updated regularly with births and deaths recorded on a daily basis.
A second Umayyad reconquest of Egypt took place during Ibn Zubayr’s rebellion and saw the arrival of fresh troops from Syria. A detailed examination of the socio-military situation in Egypt is beyond the scope of the present discussion, but the system must have been a burden on the local government and, in 809, a radical change in the way payments were rendered to the recipients was attempted. It was suggested that payments be divided into three parts, cash, grain and textiles, but in face of violent opposition the proposal had to be shelved. The use of textiles as a means of payment is interesting and might indicate government control over Egypt’s flourishing textile industry and the accumulation of surpluses. Eventually, in 834, as a result of the new socio-military policy of the caliph al-Mu'‘tasim, who removed the Arabs from the state military payroll, the system was abolished. *°
Except for the frequent references to the diwdn system, broader social policies, whether at the state level or at local Egyptian level, are rarely attested in literary sources. Among the Umayyad caliphs only ‘Umar ibn ‘Abd al-‘Aziz (‘Umar II, 717-20) captured the attention of historians. Ibn ‘Abd al-Hakam, for example, depicts him as a benevolent ruler who was also painfully aware of the difficulties involved in implementing a comprehensive welfare policy. He is described as a ruler who provided slaves to the crippled, chronically ill and blind to help them with their daily needs.
These slaves (known as al-akhmas) consisted of the share of war spoils (kAums) to which he was entitled as ruler of the state and reflected Koranic teachings concerning how booty should be divided. He is also described as handing out sadaqat, meaning either voluntary charities or alms tax money. Yahya ibn Sa‘id, the cadi of Medina, for example, stated that he was sent to Ifriqiya on behalf of the caliph to distribute sadaqat among the poor, but that he found no poor people in the province since ‘Umar II’s polices had enriched everybody.” On the other hand, the caliph was very suspicious of Sulayman ‘Abd al-Malik, who had distributed vast sums of money in Medina and expected to be praised, but ‘Umar II snapped at him saying: “You have enriched the rich and the left the poor impoverished.’*
The fiscal directives sent by ‘Umar II to Egypt can be described as a mixed bag of financial largesse and pietistic demands. The caliph ordered an overall increase of the payments rendered to Arabs in Egypt and the enlistment of fresh troops. In line with Koranic teachings, he ordered that the debts of the debtors should be paid and money be given to the righteous (a/-salibat) and those living in seclusion (ah/ al-buyitat). The caliph’s payment of debts reflects the spirit of Koran 9:60, which states that debtors are entitled to charitable giving. The caliph’s payments also went to people who were not on the military payroll. Adherence to Koranic morals and values can explain the ban on the consumption of wine and the closure of wine stores, but why women were forbidden to visit bathhouses remains vague. ‘Umar II’s military policies and payments did not endure. Because of wider financial and social considerations state policies were constantly changing, and in 720-1 the pay increases introduced by ‘Umar II were revoked.”
The Abbasid revolution enjoyed widespread support in Egypt, and the Umayyad caliph Marwan, who had fled to Fustat, found no local support there and fought his last battle against the Abbasid pursuers with only a handful of followers. The consolidation of Abbasid power in Egypt involved the execution of local opponents and rewarding Arab supporters and their families with generous distributions of ‘ata’ and sadagdt payments to the orphans and the poor. ©
If we take a broad perspective on the years 750-868, during which Egypt was directly ruled by the Abbasids, one is struck by the financial importance of the province and by the regime’s failure to govern it properly.®' The Abbasid misgovernment of Egypt was multifold and was marked by repeated Arab and Coptic rebellions and the failure to maintain a reliable local military force. Twice during the 830s large Abbasid armies were dispatched to Egypt to quell rebellions. The first was led by the future caliph al-Mu ‘tasim and the second by the reigning caliph al-Ma’min. This direct intervention brought three decades of stability but failed to address the problems that were besetting the country, and, in 866, a widescale Arab—Coptic rebellion that focused on Alexandria and the western Delta was put down by the governor after heavy fighting. The entire pattern of Abbasid rule over Egypt and the local socio-political scene was, however, dramatically altered with the arrival of Ahmad ibn Talin in 868.
Ahmad ibn Tulin belonged to the first generation of Muslims born to Turkish military slaves of the Abbasids, and from his youth he was deeply involved in Abbasid court politics. As ruler of Egypt he succeeded in establishing a short-lived quasi-independent local dynasty recognised by the Abbasids. Ahmad ibn Taliin and the other Tulunid rulers also ruled Palestine and Syria and were involved in Abbasid dynastic politics. In Egypt they created a large army and built a new government centre of which only the mosque of Ahmad ibn Taliin in Cairo has survived. The Abbasids loathed the Tulunids and, in 905, launched a massive land and sea invasion to topple the dynasty and brought Egypt back under direct Abbasid rule.
This, however, brought little comfort to the country, which was threatened by the Fatimids in Ifriqiya and needed the military assistance of the caliphate to stave off Fatimid invasions.
In 935, Muhammad ibn Tughj al-Ikhshid succeeded in establishing a second quasi-independent local dynasty recognised by the Abbasids. He belonged to the same milieu as Ahmad ibn Tilin, being a scion of Persian mercenaries in the service of the Abbasids. Egypt’s de facto independence during the Tulunid and Ikhshidid periods saw the expansion of the local administration and the rise of an assertive civilian elite. The Ikhshidid dynasty barely survived the death of its founder Muhammad ibn Tughj in 946, and only the involvement of the civilian elite in Fustat, which included members of three prominent administrative families, Shii notables and cadis, ensured the smooth transfer of rule to Unjir, Muhammad ibn Tughj’s twelve-year-old son, and the appointment of his uncle as regent. Other groups that were involved in this political pact (‘agd) were people of the court, administrators and the military. The cadis mentioned as involved in the pact were the cadis of Mecca and of Fustat, who also served as cadi of the towns of Ramla and Tiberias in Palestine. These cadis remained in Fustat and sent their representatives to the towns under their jurisdiction. Several prominent members of the corps of witnesses associated with the cadi’s court in Fustat are also mentioned as being involved in some way with the ‘aqd. The integration of the judicial system into the state structure was a typical medieval phenomenon and, by that time, the post of cadi had acquired respectability and a religious aura that was instrumental in bestowing legitimacy on the pact that preserved the political status quo and the vested interests of the groups and people involved in it.
Following Unjir’s death in 961 the rule was usurped by the black eunuch Kafar, who enjoyed the co-operation of many but mostly relied on his private army. Upon Kafur’s death in 968 a new succession of rule and disposition of power was arranged and formulated in a document devised by the vizier Ja‘far ibn Fadl ibn al-Furat and the Shi‘i notable Aba Ja‘far Musallam and also signed by Kafur’s leading military commanders. The document specified a division of responsibilities among the people involved and made allusion to an exchange of oaths invoking obedience to God, to His messenger and
to the Koranic dictum of commanding right and forbidding wrong. The document also proclaimed a political programme that promised to uphold justice, to help the oppressed against the oppressor, to care for the holy cities in Arabia and frontier towns and to conduct the holy war. This elaborate disposition of power failed to win wide approval and members of the Ikhshsdid ruling family, the administrators and the military factions remained suspicious of each other. The situation quickly deteriorated into chaos and many welcomed the Fatimid conquest of the country in 969.°
The Fatimids were an Isma ‘ili-Shi'i splinter group and bitter rivals of the Abbasids for hegemony in the Muslim world. They saw themselves as divinely chosen guided rulers (imdms) whose role was to instruct the Isma ‘ili believers towards the right path, and under their absolute rule no group had a political role, making the political blossoming of the civilian elite of Fustat a short-lived phenomenon. ‘The enduring Fatimid legacy is the establishment of Cairo and, in the broader medieval context, the integration of Egypt’s Mediterranean trade with the Indian Ocean commercial network. In terms of administrative and military organisation the Fatimid state represented the pinnacle of the political achievements of medieval Islam, but the Fatimids failed to win over the population to Ismailism. Although Isma‘ili Islam became the state religion of the country, Sunni Islam and learning continued to flourish under the Fatimids.™ The position of Ismailism was progressively eroded following the civil war (1060s—early 1070s) and the emergence of military dictators in the Fatimid state. The political fortunes of the ruling dynasty had direct repercussions on the way justice was administrated in Fatimid Egypt and one must distinguish between the periods prior to and
after the civil war. Egypt, The Country: Resources and Geopolitics
Egypt’s political history is also a reflection of the country’s uniqueness, and
this section focuses on geography and resources. It is difficult to provide a comprehensive picture of Egypt’s demography and agriculture on the eve of the Arab conquest since the impact of the Justinianic plague (541-2) and its recurrent outbreaks on Egypt’s population and agriculture is unclear. Josiah C. Russell, for example, believes that Egypt’s seventh-century population was 2.6 million, while Walter E. Kaegi states that by 600 the population of Egypt was 3 million. A much higher estimate is offered by Jean Gascou, who argues that in the 650s the population of Upper Egypt was 2 million.® Medieval authors were more generous in their estimate of Egypt’s population, with “Uthman ibn Salih (761-834) claiming that at the time of the Arab conquest Egypt’s population was 6 million.°° Two tenth-century authors, ‘Umar al-Kindi (the son of Muhammad ibn Yasuf al-Kindi) and Ibn Zilag (919-98), who wrote treaties on Fada il Misr (the Excellences of Egypt), state that a census of the population was taken during the governorship of al-Walid ibn Rafa‘ (727-35), in which 10,000 villages were counted and the population was 5 million. The estimate of Egypt’s mid-eighth-century villages is, however, questionable since much lower figures are quoted for the second half of the tenth century. It has also been claimed that on the eve of the Fatimid conquest there were 2,395 villages of which 1,439 were in the Delta. Medieval demography, however, is an elusive topic and the reliability of cadastral surveys problematic. Nonetheless, one can argue that whatever the real situation in Egypt was, for the conquerors coming from the deserts and semi-deserts of Arabia and the Middle East it was a country of plenty and could easily provide for them and their needs.
More significant than the figures quoted by ‘Umar al-Kindi and Ibn Ziulaq is their perception of what constituted a good government able to preserve and perpetuate Egypt’s agricultural wealth. This concept, expressed by the term ‘imdra, was retrospectively projected back onto the Pharaonic period, which is described as being marked by exceptionally high tax yields and concern for Egypt’s irrigation infrastructure.
Furthermore, the Pharaohs distributed payments to widows and orphans and sadagat to people who had suffered because of disasters. In another version of the ‘imdra concept, ‘Amr ibn al-‘As is portrayed as asking the Patriarch how to ensure Egypt’s prosperity and was advised to take good care of the irrigation canals and dams, to collect taxes according to accepted rules and to abolish certain impositions levied on the peasantry.”
Seventh-century conquerors of Egypt both the Persians and Arabs were quick to successfully exploit the agricultural and financial resources of the country for their needs while relying on local administration and its personnel. Whatever the advice that ‘Amr ibn al-‘As received, if he asked for any, it is clear that Muslim rulers showed ingenuity in creating and imposing new taxes and mobilising resources to maintain their armies, navies, building activities and feeding the holy cities of Arabia.” According to Muslim and non-Muslim literary sources, the exploitation of Egypt’s surplus grain took place immediately after the conquest of the country. During the sixth century Egypt’s grain had been shipped to feed Constantinople, with 160,000 metric tons being transported annually by a fleet of over 1,200 ships.
This system was gravely affected by the plague in 541 and its recurrent outbreaks and came to an end in 618 because of the Persian conquest of Egypt.”” On the request of the caliph ‘Umar I, Egypt’s grain was shipped to Arabia to feed Mecca and Medina. The Coptic chronicler John the Bishop of Nikiu (fl. second half of the eighth century) recounts that the Arabs using Coptic corvée labour re-dug the Trajan canal which linked the Nile valley with the Red Sea. Archaeological finds in Fustat support the claim that the canal was re-dug and connected the Nile through natural depressions to the Red Sea. The canal is explicitly mentioned in the correspondence of the governor Qurra ibn Sharik (709-15) and was usable when the water level of the Nile was high. The canal probably functioned as late as 775 when it either fell into disuse or was deliberately blocked.”!
In the case of Egypt’s grain economy we can truly speak about longue durée trends, and the shipment of grain to Arabia became deeply ingrained in the policies of medieval and Ottoman rulers of the country. Evidently, even when operational, the canal had its limitations and other means of transporting grain to Mecca and Medina had to be devised. In 727, on the initiative of Ibn al- Habhab, Qaysi Arabs were settled in the eastern Delta in apparently depopulated administrative districts (kara). They were given money to buy camels to transport food (most likely grain) to Qulzum (on the tip of the Gulf of Suez), apparently for shipment to Arabia. This proved to be a lucrative business and they were also instructed to breed horses and, owing to the rich local pasture, they had no expenses for fodder to feed their camels and horses. This migration was a success story that encouraged a further influx of Qaysi tribesmen to the area.”
Qulzum maintained its position as a hub for overland shipments of grain to Arabia during the tenth century prior to and after the Fatimid rule.” For the Fatimids, receiving political recognition from the local rulers of Mecca and Medina was an important asset which bolstered their overall legitimacy and was an issue in the political struggle against the Abbasids. In addition to grain, the Fatimids sent expensive high-quality inscribed textiles (tirdz) for external and internal use in the Kaaba sanctuary.” Tenth-century Egypt was an important producer of tirdg fabrics and textile-producing centres were spread all over the country. The Fatimid rulers harnessed both the agricultural and industrial resources of Egypt to enhance and manifest their predominance in Arabia.
When the overall impact of the Arab conquest of Egypt is examined, there is considerable agreement among papyrologists that the first fifty years were characterised by a subtle process involving both continuity and change. ‘The issue of continuity is extensively dealt with by Sijpesteijn, who points out that there is evidence neither for massive confiscations of land nor for the population fleeing the land following the conquest of the country. Gladys Frantz-Murphy has emphasised the continued role of the Coptic Church in the agrarian fiscal administration, while papyri dating from the 670s from Edfu in Upper Egypt reveal that the new rulers worked through the traditional local administration. Foss points out that although the Arab rulers were remote from the local provincial level their presence was felt and their orders, though frequently delayed, were eventually obeyed.”
Continuity should not obscure the fact that Arab exploitation of Egypt began early on and took place through requisitions and tax innovations. Immediately after the conquest building materials were requested from Egypt’s provinces and were shipped to Fustat to sustain building activities in the new Arab garrison town. By the time of Qurra ibn Sharik’s governorship the requisition system was in full swing with local resources and a local workforce being used for building projects in Fustat (a granary) and palaces and mosques in Damascus and Jerusalem.
The requisition orders issued by the governor of Egypt demonstrate the Umayyad capability in amassing resources and reflect both the administrative practices and the economic mindset of the rulers. The responsibility for fleets and building projects was entrusted to Arab-Muslim overseers, while these enterprises were financed through the allocation of specific sources of income to cover the required materials, workforce and costs of each project. One can doubt whether projects had well-defined budgets, and it seems that the state and the overseer in charge of a project usually had only a general idea of the costs involved and devised ways to meet them through the allocation of various regional resources. In any case, Qurra ibn Sharik’s correspondence reveals the full integration of Egypt within the broader structure of the Umayyad state.
The requisition system became embedded in Egypt’s tax structure, but fiscal tax innovations were also quickly introduced. Sijpesteijn has pointed out that the levy of the poll tax began within one generation of the Arab conquest of Egypt, while Gascou has argued that the imposition of differential poll tax on the non-Muslim male population of Egypt above the age of fourteen dates to January 653.”” Only later was the poll tax endowed with religious meanings and justifications and came to define the legal status of non-Muslims. In other cases of tax innovations, Koranic teachings were invoked from the very beginning to justify taxes imposed on Muslims.
During the 730s to 750s an alms tax (sadaqa) collected in cash and kind (animals) was imposed on the Muslim rural population of the Fayyim. The collection of these taxes was announced in a letter sent by Najid ibn Muslim, the chief tax collector of the province. The format and wording of the letter, which employs Koranic terminology referring to injunctions to pray and pay zakdt, are understood by Sijpesteijn as indicating state attempts to provide a religious aura and legitimisation for this tax innovation.”*
The implementation of another aspect of Koranic teachings (i.e. the exhortations to distribute charity to the poor and needy) is attested by an undated seventh- to eighth-century document published by Geoffrey Khan. The document includes a list of villages in the Bahnasa region (Upper Egypt) and the sums of money to be paid in each place to the poor and needy, referred to by the Koranic expression masakin wa-l-fugara’.
The sums are low, not to say trifling, but their economic impact in the rural context cannot be properly estimated.” The impression is that this distribution, whether sporadic or permanent, was more about ethics than economics. Nonetheless, it can be argued that throughout the seventh century both aspects of the Koranic teachings (i.e. the collection and distribution of charitable payments) were translated into an administrative practice that consequently was constantly developed and reshaped.
Changes that began taking place at the end of the seventh century intensified throughout the eighth century, and gradually the Coptic Church lost its intermediary role between Arab ruling officials and the peasantry. This led to a tightening of the grip over tax assessment, taxation and land, especially uncultivated land. The Islamisation of the administration meant the appointment of Muslim officials and the process of Arabisation had profound long-term effects on the administrative and social life of the country. The cumulative impact of these changes affected the tenor of life of the average Copt.
One thing that strikes the reader of the published corpus of Egyptian papyri and the growing literature that discusses these findings is how wide this impact was, an aspect completely unattested in Muslim historiography but prevalent in Coptic historiography. Three examples illustrate how papyrology expanded our understanding of the social realities of early Muslim Egypt: (1) the imposition of angaria and the concomitant problem of fugitives; (2) the conscription of the Copts into the navy and the tax burden involved in the Umayyad naval build-up; and (3) the acquisition of land by the Arabs and the early emergence of an Arab landholding elite.
When one goes beyond tax innovations and the exploitation of Egypt’s resources, one sees that the country’s geopolitical position can be characterised as being interlocked within three settings: the local, the regional (Middle Eastern) and the broader Mediterranean world. The embroilment of local, regional and Mediterranean settings touched the lives of contemporary people and can be followed through Ibn Yanus (894—958)’s biographical dictionary, which refers to the Arabs who conquered Egypt and settled in Fustat.
Many of them, like “Abd Allah ibn Hudafa, were early converts to Islam and participated in the wars of conquest under the caliphs of Medina, but eventually fell into oblivion. Others became involved, on different levels, in the affairs of the emerging Muslim state and its politics. ‘Uqba ibn ‘Amir, for example, was a companion of the Prophet and a veteran Muslim (his seniority is expressed by the terms sabika and hijra), who participated in the conquest of Egypt and, after settling in Fustat, asked Mu ‘awiya for a grant of land. During Mu ‘awiya’s reign he served as commander of the army and navy in Egypt and died in 677-8.
He is praised, rather anachronistically, for his learning in the Koranic law of inheritances.” Khalid ibn Thabit, another member of the early Muslim community, was also involved in the naval affairs of Egypt and was appointed in 671 to command the bahbr Misr, meaning Egypt’s fleet or the Mediterranean coast. Prior to that appointment he had been sent to conquer Jerusalem, but the glory for this achievement went to ‘Umar I.
His naval appointment, however, must have been short-lived, since in 674 he was campaigning in North Africa. Other people of similar background were involved in and consumed by the internal wars of early Islam. “Abd al-Rahman ibn ‘Udays, for example, who participated in the conquest of Egypt, was killed in 651-2 in Palestine while serving as commander of the cavalry force that went to fight ‘Uthman in Medina. © Within the regional Middle Eastern context Egypt served as a springboard for the conquest of North Africa. Although both regions evolved into distinctive entities, the links between them were many on both personal and political levels.
Incursions into North Africa, led by veterans of the Muslim conquest of Egypt, took place in 647-8, 657-8 and 676~7 and enriched the participants. At least three of the participants of the 647-8 campaign were people of some fame, including ‘Amr ibn al-‘As’s son ‘Abd Allah, ‘Abd Allah ibn al-‘Abbas ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalib, who was responsible for the division of the spoils, and “Abd Allah ibn Sa‘d ibn Abi Sarh, who was a military man in the full sense of the word. In 651-2, he campaigned in Nubia and, in 654, fought at the Battle of the Masts against the Byzantine navy.
The future Umayyad caliph Marwan ibn al-Hakam also participated in the 657-8 military expedition to Ifriqiya.** Egypt’s fiscal and human resources were tapped to sustain state policies in Ifriqiya. During the reign of al-Walid I (705-15), for example, 1,000 Coptic families were sent to establish the arsenal in Tunis while, during the late eighth century, 100,000 dinars of Egypt’s tax revenues were diverted to cover expenditures made in Ifriqiya.”
On the eve of the Arab-Muslim conquest Byzantium was the main naval power in the Mediterranean while Muslim naval activity in the Mediterranean can be characterised as a corollary to the conquest of the Middle East. Ibn Yunus’s biographical dictionary, which alludes to several naval commanders, describes the scope of Muslim sea endeavours during the seventh and eighth centuries, but the terms he uses, such as the common phrases bahr Misr wa-Sham and babr Ifriqiya, lack precision.
They can be understood as denoting the fleets of Syria, Egypt and Tunisia, but references are also made to the squadron of Damietta. The post of naval command must have been an assignment of trust and significance under Mu ‘awiya since he appointed one of his staunch supporters, Ibn Abi Artah, to the post. He fought with Mu ‘awiya at the Battle of Siffin and later harshly persecuted ‘Ali’s supporters in the Hijaz and Yemen. In later life, he became a pious man much concerned with ritual purity (waswas).
The full extent of the Umayyad naval effort is revealed through the letters of Qurra ibn Sharik. In Fustat there was an active shipyard and the governor frequently demanded supplies of sailors, victuals and nails for Egypt’s fleet. Sailors from Egypt were also sent to serve in the fleets of Syria and North Africa. With the exception of the 676-7 raid on Burullus (on a narrow stretch of land that separated Lake Burullus from the Mediterranean), Byzantine naval activity along the Egyptian coast is rarely mentioned during the Umayyad period. Following the fall of the Umayyads Muslim naval activity in the Eastern Mediterranean contracted and, in 853, a Byzantine fleet sacked Damietta.
This event brought the Abbasid caliph al-Mutawakkil (846-61) to fortify Egypt’s coastal towns and rebuild Egypt’s navy. Coptic historiography describes, in bleak terms, the plight of the Copts who were forcibly drafted to serve in the navy.*” Tarsiis (on the Mercin Bay) was, in fact, the main Abbasid port but its powerful navy had been reduced to impotence by the caliph al-Mu ‘tadid (892-902), who ordered its destruction following a rebellion in the town in 900. Somehow the Tarsiis navy recovered from this blow and played a role in fighting the Fatimid attempt to conquer Egypt in 920. Whatever were the fortunes of Muslim navies in the Eastern Mediterranean, maritime trade is poorly attested in early literary sources and is entirely missing from the papyri.
Egypt was at the crossroads of Mediterranean and Indian Ocean commercial networks which never ceased to be active. Both networks flourished prior to and during the Fatimid period and are alluded to in the tenth-century Fada il Misr literature and eleventhcentury Geniza documents. Egypt is described by ‘Umar al-Kindi as the entrepot (furda) of the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, San‘a, Aden, Shihr (on Arabia’s Indian Ocean’s coast) and Oman as well as India, Ceylon and China.
The port that served this commerce was Qulzum and the products traded were aromatics, gems and rare objects. Egypt’s Mediterranean trade, which involved both the Muslim Mediterranean (North Africa, including the Western Sahara [Sijilmasa], and Syria) and the Christian lands (bildid al-rim), receives more attention and its scope is better-described. ‘Umar al-Kindi, however, clearly distinguishes between Byzantium (referred to as Constantinople) and Western Europe (referred to as Rome [riimiyya] and the lands of the Franks, ifranjiyya).
The goods imported from these regions included male and female slaves, brocades, mastic gum, resin from the Storax tree (may‘a), saffron, corals and amber. In Ibn Zilaq’s writings the role of Egypt as furda is amplified and he alludes to Egypt as a hub of world trade. The significance of Egypt’s Mediterranean ports Tinnis, Damietta and, especially, Alexandria is much emphasised and Upper Egypt is described as the entrepét for trade with Africa (Beja and Ethiopia), Arabia and Yemen.
Indian Ocean trade, alluded to in the Fadil Misr literature, expanded during the eleventh century, and Mordechai Akiva Friedman describes its pivotal role in the following terms:
The India trade was the backbone of the international economy in the Middle Ages in general and within the Islamic world in particular. More than anything else, it stimulated inter-territorial traffic, furthered the rise of a flourishing merchant class and created close and fruitful links between the countries of Islam and the Far East on the one hand and Europe on the other.
Important though long-distance maritime trade with India was, one must not forget the realities of medieval times, and Jessica L. Goldberg has noted that, in the eleventh century, ‘Agriculture production determined business cycles, movements of credit and species, and even how merchants valued each other’s service’. She continues: “These activities created strong and intimate bonds between international merchants and local agriculturalists in the Islamic Mediterranean and injected coins directly into the countryside every year.
The product responsible for the ‘strong and intimate bonds between international merchants and local agriculturalists’ was flax, whose history and significance in Tulunid Egypt and later periods has been studied by Frantz-Murphy, Abraham L. Udovitch and Goldberg.”' The prosperity of the class that tapped Egypt’s agricultural wealth through the tax collection system and the cultivation of flax is reflected in the cases adjudicated at the cadi’s court in Fustat during the Tulunid period (see Chapter 2). Taking a broad view of the judicial system, it can be said that it mirrors the changes that the country underwent, and its vicissitudes and history is the subject of the following chapters.
Link
Press Here
0 التعليقات :
إرسال تعليق